Atom: Now with pair programming
1–10 of 48 posts
Re: Atom: Now with pair programming
#2Do we really need random Atom extensions posted two hours after the first commit? Is this the shortest time from initial commit (like, it looks like this is the real first commit instead of a squash-like commit for release)?
Re: Atom: Now with pair programming
#3Is it really "now with pair programming" when the software hasn't been released?
Wouldn't it be "Atom: Eventually with pair programming"?
Re: Atom: Now with pair programming
#4I have used firepad as well as other online collaborative text editors extensively, and believe it to be the best one on the market. Go Firebase!
Re: Atom: Now with pair programming
#5Do we really need random Atom extensions posted two hours after the first commit? Is this the shortest time from initial commit (like, it looks like this is the real first commit instead of a squash-like commit for release)?
[deleted]
Re: Atom: Now with pair programming
#6It was so much fun to build this package. Atom is very modular, and any piece of functionality in the editor is open to being extended.
The documentation still has some ways to go (events aren't documented, for example), but I'm excited about the future of this editor!
Re: Atom: Now with pair programming
#7Is it really "now with pair programming" when the software hasn't been released? Wouldn't it be "Atom: Eventually with pair programming"?
Some people are in fact using it now. You just had to snag an invite.
Beta software can gain features.
Re: Atom: Now with pair programming
#8Having painfully hacked together a few packages for ST (and TM) over the years, I'm impressed at how fast they pulled this together. If it's this easy to extend, Atom could have a very bright future.
Re: Atom: Now with pair programming
#9Re: Atom: Now with pair programming
#10it's time to stop using github.