Live data from Hacker News

Atom

atom.io

131–140 of 662 posts

Re: Atom

#131

So it's light table without Chris Granger, for better or worse..

Light Table is a great project, but it's all in closurescript -.- This is a big obstacle to people wanting to edit/customize/write their own plugins

It's really sad that learning a new language is considered "a big obstacle." An average programmer should be able to pick up nearly any new computing language quite easily.

Re: Atom

#132
post #83
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think he means that we need editors that are powerful AND easy to use. Seems like vim isn't really for someone like me (I haven't studied PhD level computer science and I don't write compilers and/or lisp interpreters in my spare time for fun).

Not to get on vim tangent but it's very easy to learn vim slowly. If you use a gui like MacVim you can still use cmd+s to save, etc. and use it like a normal editor. The only thing you are really required to know is the difference between normal and insert modes.

Yeah, I understand what you're saying. It's just hard for me to justify (to myself) learning vim (or emacs, or vi, or whatever) when I can just load up Sublime Text and start working on something.

Put another way: working with Sublime Text and Adobe Brackets is a good experience for me... There's nothing that screams out at me "Man, this sucks, I need to go learn vim."

Re: Atom

#133
I find it interesting that there is little to no conversation about the integration with git. In one of the the screenshots I saw a branch name and icon in the bottom status bar. I assume this is an important motivation for GitHub.

Re: Atom

#134

Can you edit files while offline? Or do you need to be always-connected? (i.e. this is an actual web service) I couldn't find mention anywhere about offline abilities.

There is no online component. So yes, you can edit offline.

Re: Atom

#135
post #2

I can't tell from this page whether it's open source -- I hope it is.

Usually if you don't see "free" or "open source" mentioned on the main page it means it's not going to be either of these two (or at least that it hasn't been decided yet).

Re: Atom

#136
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think he means that we need editors that are powerful AND easy to use. Seems like vim isn't really for someone like me (I haven't studied PhD level computer science and I don't write compilers and/or lisp interpreters in my spare time for fun).

You don't need to do those things to use vim. It just has a kind of steep learning curve -- one that has to do with just getting used to its keybindings (ie, nothing to do with PhD level cs or writing compilers).

I was being a smartass, which wasn't fair to angersocks.

My point is that I can load up Sublime Text or Brackets or this (maybe?) and work in a very efficient way.

Re: Atom

#138
post #105
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think he means that we need editors that are powerful AND easy to use. Seems like vim isn't really for someone like me (I haven't studied PhD level computer science and I don't write compilers and/or lisp interpreters in my spare time for fun).

Vim is actualy pretty easy to use, the learning process is not hard at all you could just go through the vim tutorial that comes with and you will in good shape in no time.

I'm sure it's not terrible to use, but I'm not sure it's worth it for a caveman like me to put time into learning it. Sublime Text and Brackets already work very efficiently and allow me to focus on getting things done.

Of course, PHP people probably said the same thing when Rails came out. The difference is that current GUI editors are already very advanced. I'm skeptical that I would get any efficiency boost from vim (at least anytime soon).

Re: Atom

#140
post #23

The more I see new editors floating around, the more I'm sticking to VIm. I am getting old, or it's a just a survival instinct. On the other hand, the more the better, but we have already too many editors around.

If vim works great for you, then rock on! We can't have too many editors, though. Bad ones will fail to gain traction, and it's always good to get new ideas and modern techniques out there.
Post reply on HN