Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is true with or without this bug.
Without this bug, they wouldn't be able to use BofA's own certificate to do it.
Apple releases OS X Mavericks 10.9.2 with SSL fix
111–120 of 246 posts
Re: Apple releases OS X Mavericks 10.9.2 with SSL fix
#112I'm still not upgrading to Mavericks. I have a lot of work to do, and I dislike being asked to upend my system on somebody else's schedule.
If you don’t run Mavericks you’re not affected by the goto fail.
I think I'm just bothered by my perception that this Mavericks upgrade is being presented as a fix for an OS X security issue, rather than just offering a patch to Mavericks users.
Re: Apple releases OS X Mavericks 10.9.2 with SSL fix
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder if their hope is everything transitions to something like iOS before this is falsified in a widespread way on OSX in public. In corporate settings with desktop management, Macs are actually a huge pain to deal with; Windows maybe starts from crappier defaults but there's a much more mature industry around locking it down.
Hence why you want to be the odd one out with a Mac at Corporates: IT leaves you alone and you can manage it yourself.
Re: Apple releases OS X Mavericks 10.9.2 with SSL fix
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is true with or without this bug.
The difference is this bug will grant you the lock icon, and your browser will "guarantee" you're speaking to the real bankofamerica. Practically speaking, that probably doesn't matter, because someone who understands that won't click on an email and log in to bankofamericaa.com. But there is a difference.
Re: Apple releases OS X Mavericks 10.9.2 with SSL fix
#115Oh, good: there's a standalone installer available (http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1726). But the download is served over HTTP. Maybe I can just try the same URL with HTTPS:
$ curl --head https://support.apple.com/downloads/DL1726/en_US/OSXUpdCombo10.9.2.dmg
HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily
Server: Apache/2.2.24 (Unix)
Location: http://download.info.apple.com/Mac_OS_X/031-3279.20140225.Zzasf/OSXUpdCombo10.9.2.dmg
Nope. Well, at least I can verify the SHA1 sum displayed on the download page. Wait, no, that was served over HTTP, too.Okay, I'll follow Apple's instructions for checking the certificate fingerprint in the installer (http://support.apple.com/kb/ht5044). But that page (Last modified November 2011) displays a different fingerprint (9C864771 vs FA02790F)...and that fingerprint was also served over HTTP.
Gives up and opens the App Store.
Re: Apple releases OS X Mavericks 10.9.2 with SSL fix
#116The fun thing to think about is whether or not you can guarantee that the update you receive is actually from Apple and not someone sending you a fake via MITM. Sure, they show a SHA1 on this page: http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1726 but that could be MITM'd as well.
Re: Apple releases OS X Mavericks 10.9.2 with SSL fix
#117Forgive me, but I'm not really sure why this is getting so much attention. It's certainly a bad bug, and it ought to have been caught. But it feels like this would be much harder to exploit than many other bugs which have had far less hoopla. As I understand, this SSL bug makes it rather trivial to perform MITM attacks against apps which use the default system SSL libs. That's certainly a problem, but most people are…
- It really is a severe bug in a major platform (and by that I mean iOS not MacOS)
- It is easy to understand once spotted, so everybody who can read code in the entire planet can write about how stupid Apple is because they refuse to see the light and switch over to their favorite pet language/coding standard/methodology
- The NSA has massive MITM capabilities and is known to sabotage American products and this looks like a very, very convenient bug to have for them, leading to speculation that this could not be a mistake
- Apple haters.
Re: Apple releases OS X Mavericks 10.9.2 with SSL fix
#118The fun thing to think about is whether or not you can guarantee that the update you receive is actually from Apple and not someone sending you a fake via MITM. Sure, they show a SHA1 on this page: http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1726 but that could be MITM'd as well.
(And no, this bug didn't break client-side signed package verification.)
Re: Apple releases OS X Mavericks 10.9.2 with SSL fix
#119Damn, I was close… :-) http://i.imgur.com/vKnXhJ8.png
Isn't yours just a manifestation of the general TLS bug? Or does it differ somehow?
So maybe it brought some eyes on the "gotofail" but that's just speculation…
Thanks anonymous Apple guy :)
Re: Apple releases OS X Mavericks 10.9.2 with SSL fix
#120Does it fix the networking stack also? Please dear god let it fix the networking stack. ( https://discussions.apple.com/thread/5551686?start=0&tstart=... )