Live data from Hacker News

LinkedIn is not using email contacts to find people who have an account already

plus.google.com

171–180 of 187 posts

Re: LinkedIn is not using email contacts to find people who have an account already

#171
post #18

I know I'm a bitch for laughing that an article about Linked In inflating its usage figures is posted on Google+.

Surely the fact it's posted from there indicates that the whole "its a ghost town, they're just lying" meme might be obviously false?

Why do you posit that?

Re: LinkedIn is not using email contacts to find people who have an account already

#172
post #107
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Look at every famous company and you'll find tactics that you don't agree with Most people here recognize that growth hacking is necessary for a startup to grow. The users complain only when the tactics employed do not result in a better experience for them. This was not the case when AirBnB, YouTube, etc executed their growth hacking tactics. AirBnB: Their growth hacking tactic of posting to Craigslist resulted in…

How is growing their user base not making the experience better? Most people use LinkedIn to find people, no?

I used to use it to find jobs, but it's no better for that than Craigslist or an ad-mill these days.

Re: LinkedIn is not using email contacts to find people who have an account already

#173
post #121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does "active" Google+ users include people who are logged in and have plus-related stuff-they-don't-care-about in their standard google header? Or people who just reciprocate circle-adds but don't engage whatsoever?

Or even just people who click the bell when it's lit up red to make the notification go away.

Engagement hacking!

Re: LinkedIn is not using email contacts to find people who have an account already

#175

This obsession with collecting users (dead or alive) reminds me of Gogol's Dead Souls - companies trading in users (who may or may not exist) in order to boost their standing and taking out huge loans on the basis of their illusory popularity. Even illusory users can have some value, just like the dead serfs in Gogol's tale, and like the dead serfs, their value is not in their existence, but in being entries on a led…

Not saying that the "dead souls" trend isn't real, but I don't actually think these accounts themselves are what LinkedIn is using to boost their user numbers. The goal for the dead souls is to boost activation by getting more and more real people to create accounts. Still the same motivation, but I doubt their long-term goal is to be counting tons of fake users as users. It's sooner to find new (potentially scam-y)…

I didn't mean to imply that, but rereading the post I see why people have read it that way. That wasn't really the objection I have to this, more that a focus on user numbers growing at all costs leads to all sorts of evil activity like using ghost users to try to trick people into spamming their contacts list.

Re: LinkedIn is not using email contacts to find people who have an account already

#176

> "LinkedIn allows you to sign in to your email account and it will scan your contacts..." Hand my contacts list to a website? No thank you. When is letting a website have this a good idea, not just Linkedin, but ever ?

I never gave them password to my gmail account, and yet they somehow harvested an email I never used for anything. I wrote about it here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6935606 . I suspect they stole it from my phone when I installed LinkedIn app (never do it).

Re: LinkedIn is not using email contacts to find people who have an account already

#177
post #2

Misrepresentation can be a very serious offence. I'd like to hear LinkedIn's argument for impersonating people who don't use the platform.

A P/E of nearly 1000x, yet falling price? Perhaps some of them still haven't cashed out? So drive this stuff like mad to get another "good" quarter and win?

Re: LinkedIn is not using email contacts to find people who have an account already

#178

For what it's worth, LinkedIn has different wording on this page for people who have an account and those who don't. For people who have an account already, the button says "Connect". For those who don't it says "Add to Network". I agree that even "Add to Network" may mean to "my network", which is misleading.

I'm amazed nobody else has mentioned this. Everyone's talking about how this is such a dark pattern, but the interface clearly shows the distinction between the two interactions.

Re: LinkedIn is not using email contacts to find people who have an account already

#179
post #37

I've never intentionally shared my contacts with LinkedIn and yet I get shown names from my address book. One was my teenage son and I tried to connect thinking he'd signed up for some reason. Nope, he'd never even considered it. I don't know where LinkedIn got my contacts from but I suspect I must have missed a setting when I briefly installed the mobile app a few years ago. Some of the email addresses they have are…

Came here to post the same; after seeing as "people you may know" some email contacts that may not even know what LinkedIn is (such as my mom), I strongly suspect they're doing something even more shady to grab my contacts. I have never installed the mobile app.

One extremely sly thing they do is send you requests based on who you and other people you know/may know have searched for. If you're in the habit of looking up old colleagues when logged in, even if you're not browsing publicly, they will get you as a suggestion. As a result you may find that random people you almost certainly knew, but aren't in your address book, will be suggested.

Re: LinkedIn is not using email contacts to find people who have an account already

#180
post #130

Bizarre headline rewrite, there.

Yep. Not what I submitted it with. If they're not using email addresses to identify people you might know then what are they using?

People you searched for, people who searched for you, people you know who have those contacts in their address books and have searched for them, etc, etc. You don't explicitly need the address book and this way they suggest people that you don't have, but almost certainly know.
Post reply on HN