This obsession with collecting users (dead or alive) reminds me of Gogol's Dead Souls - companies trading in users (who may or may not exist) in order to boost their standing and taking out huge loans on the basis of their illusory popularity. Even illusory users can have some value, just like the dead serfs in Gogol's tale, and like the dead serfs, their value is not in their existence, but in being entries on a led…
LinkedIn is not using email contacts to find people who have an account already
81–90 of 187 posts
Re: LinkedIn is not using email contacts to find people who have an account already
#82Re: LinkedIn is not using email contacts to find people who have an account already
#83Re: LinkedIn is not using email contacts to find people who have an account already
#84This is deceptive at best. I've been a fan of LinkedIn as a company until now.
* 2012 hack. 6.5M unsalted SHA1 password hashes leaked [1]
* 2013 Acquires Pulse, forces existing users to create a LinkedIn account. Users are pissed [2]
* 2013 LinkedIn Intro. In case you missed it, it was an iOS app that changed your mail settings to proxy your incoming mail through linkedin's servers in order to inject a frame with business-card-like CTAs. In the meantime, this naturally gave them instant access to all your emails. Massive privacy implications.
* 2013 LinkedIn Intro, 3 days after release. Jordan Wright shows a CSS-based phishing attack: security implications as well [3]
My personal experience with LinkedIn:
* My profile info is available to premium users without my consent
* Premium users can spam me without my consent.
* "Who viewed your profile" feature. Unbelievable.
* Constant contact requests from random people. I can't turn their email notifications off entirely (introductions are mandatory). EDIT: I was mistaken - the process is very straightforward [5]
* They seem to be in the business of intentionally misleading people (2011) [4]
So, personally I'm the furthest you can get from being a fan and I can't imagine what you were a fan of. They're top ranking on my shit list.
[1] http://blog.linkedin.com/2012/06/06/linkedin-member-password...
[2] http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2306932/linkedin-in...
[3] http://jordan-wright.github.io/blog/2013/10/26/phishing-with...
[4] http://www.michielgaasterland.com/online-reputation/try-link...
[5] http://www.businessinsider.com/how-to-disable-all-of-linkedi...
Re: LinkedIn is not using email contacts to find people who have an account already
#85This obsession with collecting users (dead or alive) reminds me of Gogol's Dead Souls - companies trading in users (who may or may not exist) in order to boost their standing and taking out huge loans on the basis of their illusory popularity. Even illusory users can have some value, just like the dead serfs in Gogol's tale, and like the dead serfs, their value is not in their existence, but in being entries on a led…
Is there any evidence LinkedIn reports all members email contacts as LinkedIn users? The g+ post just displays OP's confusion at "connect" really meaning "invite" in instances where contacts don't have a LinkedIn account.
LinkedIn claims X number of users
Suggested connections by LinkedIn can be generated for users that do not even have a present LinkedIn account.
Therefor, the number X must include those users.
Re: LinkedIn is not using email contacts to find people who have an account already
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there any evidence LinkedIn reports all members email contacts as LinkedIn users? The g+ post just displays OP's confusion at "connect" really meaning "invite" in instances where contacts don't have a LinkedIn account.
None whatsoever, the OP is making a gigantic leap based on a logical fallacy. LinkedIn claims X number of users Suggested connections by LinkedIn can be generated for users that do not even have a present LinkedIn account. Therefor, the number X must include those users.
But it's far more likely that it's just an error of judgement, involving no formal or informal logic at all.
Namely, nobody, including OP, made the syllogism you present, with the neat "therefore, X must include" etc step.
They simply thought that it's very probable that this is what LinkedIn did to inflate their numbers.
Re: LinkedIn is not using email contacts to find people who have an account already
#87> "LinkedIn allows you to sign in to your email account and it will scan your contacts..." Hand my contacts list to a website? No thank you. When is letting a website have this a good idea, not just Linkedin, but ever ?
There was a time when LinkedIn would often require you to re-enter you login details, seemingly at random. Login details consist, of course, of your email address plus a password, and so if you used the site much you kind of got used to entering them in every time they were requested. The login form, unsurprisingly, looked very similar to the one suggesting that you give LinkedIn your email address plus you email acc…
Re: LinkedIn is not using email contacts to find people who have an account already
#88I promptly uninstalled it.