Live data from Hacker News

Moon

typesetinthefuture.com

41–50 of 92 posts

Re: Moon

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a great film, but I'm not sure why knowing more about the plot or the background to the design would ruin it for you? Do you also worry about spoilers for works of literature or films from the past? What about spoilers for young people on the entirety of human output? I agree everyone should go watch this film, as it was really fascinating and a probably far more realistic take on living in space than most -…

I disagree. Even without plot twists, a movie is often a process of discovery. You explore the character, narration, allusions, themes, and language in the order they're shown in the film. And Moon in particular is such a carefully paced movie. So while I agree that the plot spoilers may not matter much in this case, I think you'd have a much different and likely inferior experience watching Moon after reading this b…

If you do consistently find things spoiled by foreknowledge, there is a simple solution - just avoid reading articles or discussions which mention the film before you see it (stop reading at the word Moon!), no need to call out spoilers because every meaningful discussion of this film will be a spoiler in some sense, and many people enjoy discussing films and books online after or before they see them. I'm not sure where this cult of no-spoilers has come from, but it damages public discussion - all content could be spoilers for someone so reviews become a cryptic set of hints instead of a full discussion with examples and no-one can speak frankly about stories without hearing 'spoilers'. The responsibility for avoiding exposure should fall on the person who doesn't want to know things, rather than on everyone else.

It's interesting, because I find more pleasure sometimes in rereading a book or watching a film again than the first time, specifically because of having a deeper understanding of it, the background to the characters, other films like it, and perhaps noticing things that were missed the first time round. Broader knowledge (from others or from previous experiences) actually helps further enjoyment in many cases, because it deepens your understanding when you are exposed. So I'd say go ahead and enjoy reading about things beforehand, you may well find it actually improves the experience - in some cases like James Joyce, or to a lesser extent Shakespeare, it becomes almost essential.

Re: Moon

#42
post #15

Just a warning: if you haven't yet seen the movie, the article contains significant plot spoilers. Moon is a fantastic movie, so go watch it on Netflix then read all about the typography afterwards.

This is a great film, but I'm not sure why knowing more about the plot or the background to the design would ruin it for you? Do you also worry about spoilers for works of literature or films from the past? What about spoilers for young people on the entirety of human output? I agree everyone should go watch this film, as it was really fascinating and a probably far more realistic take on living in space than most -…

Classic HN comment. "The whole concept of spoilers is an anti-pattern"

Re: Moon

#43

Soylent is in this film! Predicting today's Soylent future food. http://soylent.me I wonder if this is how Rob came up with the name for his future food.

It's an allusion to Soylent Green, from a much earlier cult sci-fi film.

Re: Moon

#44

Soylent is in this film! Predicting today's Soylent future food. http://soylent.me I wonder if this is how Rob came up with the name for his future food.

Good god I hope you are kidding and not an idiot.

Just in case:

Original Book: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_Room%21_Make_Room%21

Movie: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soylent_Green

Re: Moon

#45
Just FYI there is a mildly NWS image in here, (a shower scene bum). Not the end of the world, but my scroll timing was suboptimal :(

Re: Moon

#46

> He’s keeping count of his days on the Moon with a dry-wipe marker on the bathroom wall. By my reckoning, this is 146 days and counting – not quite the nearly-three-years mentioned in the plot: No, but 3 years is remarkably close to 146 weeks.

With hueman* it would have been easier. It is funny how I never thought about emotional updates and now two are kind of on the HN frontpage.

[] http://www.huemanapp.com/ [*] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7229040

Re: Moon

#47

The haircut machine in Moon blew my mind, I can't believe it actually exists, and on such a prestigious domain name! www.haircut.com

if you're a child of the 80s you'll also recognize: http://www.flowbee.com

They showed this on the UK tv programme "Tomorrow's World". The person receiving the haircut was distressed at the results.

TW was great because they demod the tech live and it often failed. Watching someone Getting a terrible haircut, live on tv, and being visibly upset by it was interesting.

Re: Moon

#48
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a great film, but I'm not sure why knowing more about the plot or the background to the design would ruin it for you? Do you also worry about spoilers for works of literature or films from the past? What about spoilers for young people on the entirety of human output? I agree everyone should go watch this film, as it was really fascinating and a probably far more realistic take on living in space than most -…

I managed to get my girls to watch Empire Strikes Back at just old enough to appreciate the films, and fortunately before they had heard that Vader was Luke's father. More than most spoilers, for some reason for this one it was really important to me that they experience the revelation in the film.

I remember watching Psycho with my first girlfriend. She had what you'd call a sheltered upbringing. (If readers have had one too, SPOILERS FOLLOW.)

Janet Leigh gets in the shower. "Is...is this the film with the shower scene?", says my girlfriend.

Janet Leigh is attacked. "But she can't be dead - she's the main character!"

As a film student, I was grateful to see the initial 1960 reaction played out in my living room.

Re: Moon

#49
post #45

Just FYI there is a mildly NWS image in here, (a shower scene bum). Not the end of the world, but my scroll timing was suboptimal :(

The internet approved acronym is NSFW.

Re: Moon

#50
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

if you're a child of the 80s you'll also recognize: http://www.flowbee.com

I've actually used one of these once. Once. If I cared that little about how my hair looks, I'd just get some clippers.

I thought Flowbee was just clippers - the thing I hate most about cutting hair is the hair getting everywhere, especially short clippings. That's exactly the pain point being addressed with vacuum haircutting isn't it.
Post reply on HN