Angular JS Kinda Sucks
okmaya.com
Angular JS Kinda Sucks
1–10 of 66 posts
Re: Angular JS Kinda Sucks
#2Re: Angular JS Kinda Sucks
#3This is an apples to oranges comparison.
Re: Angular JS Kinda Sucks
#4Well done.
Re: Angular JS Kinda Sucks
#5Re: Angular JS Kinda Sucks
#6When I started using Angular I had really no experience with jquery or any other js framework, and I felt Angular was intuitive.
Re: Angular JS Kinda Sucks
#7Re: Angular JS Kinda Sucks
#8A big point about angular's tutorial is that it isn't really explicit enough is how everything links together. It's a lot easier to learn angular by taking some sort of class or going to some presentation, because the tutorial in its current form does not explain general architecture.
Another issue is a lot of people present angular as this sort of "oh hey, check out the data-binding stuff!" , when that is just a small part of the entire mechanism. Angular's big advantage is that it allows you to organize your javascript into nice little modules, and it gives you deterministic behavior about how these load (with the dependency resolution and whatnot).
Re: Angular JS Kinda Sucks
#9this guy describes himself as a "Programmer Extraordinaire" on linkedin
If you have one page with one complex interactive form, with a calculator, that grabs prices from out there on The Web, then it’s a one page design, but complexity of that one page is way high, depending on all of the features on it. Calculator, 2 points. Search 3 points. Connecting to databases and APIs, 5 points. You get the idea.
Both projects can be about 100 points. One more complex than the other, and one more pages than the other. And now for the prices:
$125 – $250 per point.
That’s it. Why the wide range? Depends on a lot of things. But, on average, I can do about 39 points in two weeks. Considering the overhead, taxes, etc, that comes to about $60-$120 per hour."
Re: Angular JS Kinda Sucks
#10I wouldn't use Angular for a small'ih average website where you want some minor JS-based UI functionality. But I found Angular much more suited than jQuery for big sites that are maintained by more than just one developer. You can look at some piece of HTML and you can tell from the list of directives what's going on. No stray click handlers and whatnot.
One of my more recent clients had used jQuery for ~8 years, the HTML had changed a lot in that time and the JS had grown like a cancer due to developer fluctation and people just adding code to fix their current problems. Quite frankly, it was a mess. I believe that with a framework like Angular it wouldn't have gotten out of hand like this, mostly due to its modular approach to everything.