Live data from Hacker News

Ask YC: Whats better than AJAX?

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 32 posts

Ask YC: Whats better than AJAX?

#1
What will be the most common web application framework for the next ten years. I'm just getting started in the industry and plan to put in my time. I want to do some indepth study and have been visiting the usual channels that discuss "the best" languages. Given that you YC folks are in the eye of the storm I thought to ask you. Best,

Re: Ask YC: Whats better than AJAX?

#3
Well, if I was to predict the future I would say that we will see new browser architectures that will allow new types of code to be written that are not currently possible. I think web browsers will be more like a VM that can run any kind of code compiled to them instead of being forced to render only HTML and JavaScript. I would take a look at the things about web development that people currently complain about and would venture to say that some smart people will get together and address them.

Re: Ask YC: Whats better than AJAX?

#7

If Adobe AIR and Microsoft Silverlight continue to gain traction then they could begin to replace AJAX-style implementations for feature-rich web sites. The key word here is could .

Ok. This comment will be a little over the top, but here goes. I'm actually getting sick of how MS releases products. I never used to care enough to think that having everything under the sun covered was a problem. I think in the end, Microsoft's enormous technology and feature base will be what does them in.

To use Silverlight as an example, I think it sucks. It's bloated and I don't get it. I'm tired of playing catch up with MS technologies and all the freaking featues they pack into them. I mean: ASP.NET. ASP.NET AJAX VB.NET 3.0, LINQ, F#, C#, J# (being retired), VBScript, VS 2003, VS 2005, VS Team Foundation, Windows Workflow, Windows Communication Foundation and Windows Presentation Foundation. Seriously?

Windows Workflow in particular is extraordinarily huge. If keeping a program in one's head is important (and it is), then it's not going to happen with Windows Workflow. As I get more comfortable knowing what I want to code and how I want to code it, I'm finding myself just wanting to use stuff that gets it done in the path that is the most natural to me.

Silverlight? No, thanks.

Re: Ask YC: Whats better than AJAX?

#9
AJAX is not a framework, others build theirs based on it. Anyway, it will be hot for at least 5 years so it doesn't really matter what will replace it.

Until then, the next version of XMLHttpRequest should somehow provide a way for the server to send a request to the client, not needinng the client to make requests all the time...

Or maybe you should be asking what will replace or make better the DOM?

Re: Ask YC: Whats better than AJAX?

#10

Well, if I was to predict the future I would say that we will see new browser architectures that will allow new types of code to be written that are not currently possible. I think web browsers will be more like a VM that can run any kind of code compiled to them instead of being forced to render only HTML and JavaScript. I would take a look at the things about web development that people currently complain about and…

That sounds eerily reminiscent of Java applets.
Post reply on HN