Curse Of The Gifted (2000)
21–30 of 371 posts
Re: Curse Of The Gifted (2000)
#22Re: Curse Of The Gifted (2000)
#23Re: Curse Of The Gifted (2000)
#24For example: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/23/75
Re: Curse Of The Gifted (2000)
#25Warning to the unexpecting, this was written by Eric S. Raymond.
Re: Curse Of The Gifted (2000)
#26The benefit of recognizing this isn't just avoiding that crunch at the limits of your talents - it's learning to the use the tools, processes and people which will allow your talents to flow most efficiently every day.
The classic example of this for me has been engineers who resist documentation, project management and delegation as if each is wasting away their valuable productive time when it's exactly the opposite.
Re: Curse Of The Gifted (2000)
#27Re: Curse Of The Gifted (2000)
#28This is so inadvertently affectionate. It's like a grandparent trying to calm down their overconfident, arrogant child. So eloquent. As a side note, I can't even imagine how Torvalds worked with others without source control. That sounds like absolute hell.
Re: Curse Of The Gifted (2000)
#29That said, the "curse of the gifted" manifests itself in a lot of ways. One problem is also that "less gifted" see the "gifted" and say, "If they don't have to be disciplined, why do I?"
Re: Curse Of The Gifted (2000)
#30(2000) Not that it isn't relevant, but it is 14 years old and the title should probably reflect that.
yeah seriously this might have been the suggestion that led to bitkeeper that led to git. Which Linus invented and coded up essentially to solve some of the problems brought up here Which (git) today arguably has done more for programming groups than all the new languages and frameworks of the past fourteen years combined. So, it is interesting. But mostly interesting because of how massive Git spawned from it.