[1] https://github.com/steeve/boot2docker/releases/tag/v0.5.2
Docker 0.8: Quality, new builder features, btrfs, OSX support
11–20 of 128 posts
Re: Docker 0.8: Quality, new builder features, btrfs, OSX support
#12Just to clarify on the OSX support: obviously we did not magically get Darwin to support linux containers. But we put together the easiest possible way to run Linux containers on a Mac without depending on another machine. We do this by combining (1) docker in "client mode", which connects to (2) a super-lightweight linux VM using boot2docker. The details are on http://docs.docker.io/en/latest/installation/mac/
[1] https://github.com/steeve/boot2docker/releases/tag/v0.5.2
Re: Docker 0.8: Quality, new builder features, btrfs, OSX support
#13Just to clarify on the OSX support: obviously we did not magically get Darwin to support linux containers. But we put together the easiest possible way to run Linux containers on a Mac without depending on another machine. We do this by combining (1) docker in "client mode", which connects to (2) a super-lightweight linux VM using boot2docker. The details are on http://docs.docker.io/en/latest/installation/mac/
Re: Docker 0.8: Quality, new builder features, btrfs, OSX support
#14Re: Docker 0.8: Quality, new builder features, btrfs, OSX support
#15Re: Docker 0.8: Quality, new builder features, btrfs, OSX support
#16Just to clarify on the OSX support: obviously we did not magically get Darwin to support linux containers. But we put together the easiest possible way to run Linux containers on a Mac without depending on another machine. We do this by combining (1) docker in "client mode", which connects to (2) a super-lightweight linux VM using boot2docker. The details are on http://docs.docker.io/en/latest/installation/mac/
Too bad it depends on VirtualBox - had a lot of kernel panics when using it, so I decided to stick with VMware fusion.
Re: Docker 0.8: Quality, new builder features, btrfs, OSX support
#17Just to clarify on the OSX support: obviously we did not magically get Darwin to support linux containers. But we put together the easiest possible way to run Linux containers on a Mac without depending on another machine. We do this by combining (1) docker in "client mode", which connects to (2) a super-lightweight linux VM using boot2docker. The details are on http://docs.docker.io/en/latest/installation/mac/
Once I got that ironed out, everything is running very smoothly, and I don't have to ssh into the VM to do things. Nicely done.
My wish for 0.9 is a more streamlined installation process, possibly by simply incorporating these steps into a Homebrew formula.
Re: Docker 0.8: Quality, new builder features, btrfs, OSX support
#18Just to clarify on the OSX support: obviously we did not magically get Darwin to support linux containers. But we put together the easiest possible way to run Linux containers on a Mac without depending on another machine. We do this by combining (1) docker in "client mode", which connects to (2) a super-lightweight linux VM using boot2docker. The details are on http://docs.docker.io/en/latest/installation/mac/
Re: Docker 0.8: Quality, new builder features, btrfs, OSX support
#19Just to clarify on the OSX support: obviously we did not magically get Darwin to support linux containers. But we put together the easiest possible way to run Linux containers on a Mac without depending on another machine. We do this by combining (1) docker in "client mode", which connects to (2) a super-lightweight linux VM using boot2docker. The details are on http://docs.docker.io/en/latest/installation/mac/
It is especially important to set DOCKER_HOST=tcp:/// before you run "boot2docker init" -- I forgot to do this initially and things failed mysteriously. I had to "boot2docker delete" and re-init to get things running. Once I got that ironed out, everything is running very smoothly, and I don't have to ssh into the VM to do things. Nicely done. My wish for 0.9 is a more streamlined installation process, possibly by si…
Re: Docker 0.8: Quality, new builder features, btrfs, OSX support
#20I'm curious about how the focus on multiple, ABI-incompatible platforms will affect the pace and momentum of Docker development. So far, Docker has benefitted a lot from the focus on amd64 userland on Linux.