Noun.
Paper, by MiSoft
31–40 of 80 posts
Re: Paper, by MiSoft
#32I honestly have to say that i find myself highly amused by people appropiating the names of everyday objects for their products, exhibiting no common sense or creativity, and then getting upset in true kindergarten style when others do the same thing.
> exhibiting no common sense or creativity I think it makes perfect sense to name products with words that exist (like "Sprite", "Mustang", and "Tide"), or a compound word made up of 2+ words. Making up new words ("Pepsi", "Camaro", and "Clorox") can be a lot more risky, especially if it's a consumer brand. What would you have named Facebook Paper instead?
Re: Paper, by MiSoft
#33Re: Paper, by MiSoft
#34Re: Paper, by MiSoft
#35More to this story http://figure53.com/notes/2014-02-04-david-and-goliath/ 53 looks more and more like a jerk here
How is this much different than the "Candy" "Saga" situation?
Re: Paper, by MiSoft
#36Personally, I tend to think of names as a fraction of what makes up an idea multiplier [0].
Re: Paper, by MiSoft
#37FiftyThree just posted this on Twitter: .@daringfireball please don’t take the bait. Paper by miSoft V1 was launched Sep 20th 2012, 5 month after us. https://twitter.com/FiftyThree/status/430845528805756928
Wasn't their point that they registered the name Paper with Apple before anyone else? You can register an app name and have it held for a couple months I think before actually launching.
Re: Paper, by MiSoft
#38I honestly have to say that i find myself highly amused by people appropiating the names of everyday objects for their products, exhibiting no common sense or creativity, and then getting upset in true kindergarten style when others do the same thing.
> exhibiting no common sense or creativity I think it makes perfect sense to name products with words that exist (like "Sprite", "Mustang", and "Tide"), or a compound word made up of 2+ words. Making up new words ("Pepsi", "Camaro", and "Clorox") can be a lot more risky, especially if it's a consumer brand. What would you have named Facebook Paper instead?
In short: Hire a gaggle of lawyers before using any of these verbatim: http://simple.wiktionary.org/wiki/Wiktionary:Most_frequent_1...
Re: Paper, by MiSoft
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
> exhibiting no common sense or creativity I think it makes perfect sense to name products with words that exist (like "Sprite", "Mustang", and "Tide"), or a compound word made up of 2+ words. Making up new words ("Pepsi", "Camaro", and "Clorox") can be a lot more risky, especially if it's a consumer brand. What would you have named Facebook Paper instead?
ThePaper
Re: Paper, by MiSoft
#40It's almost as if there needs to be an entire regulatory scheme for dealing with naming disputes, which would allow app developers and startups to protect their brand. Oh wait, there is, it's called Trademark Law! As such, it's getting really old seeing a bunch of angry parties writing open letters and rants on social media trying to claim they're the morally superior party for [BS REASON HERE]. None of that matters.…
I doubt that Misoft has sufficient resources to "lawyer up". That right is reserved to big companies with lots of money. Like Facebook.
All this litigation via social media is happening exactly because these are small companies that don't have the resources to litigate via the courts.