Live data from Hacker News

Chromecast now open to developers with the Google Cast SDK

googledevelopers.blogspot.com

241–250 of 257 posts

Re: Chromecast now open to developers with the Google Cast SDK

#241

I love my Chromecast and use it extensively. This is what Miracast should have been, something that "just worked" and seamlessly interconnected devices. But instead Miracast is yet another classic example of "death of committee" where tons of big media and hardware companies wanted to get their features and DRM in, and as a direct result we now have dozens of completely incompatible Miracast devices. I think this tab…

I've had the entirely opposite experience here. Miracast just works for me. I have the Netgear receiver and I've used it with several different phones - Samsung, HTC, and LG. In fact, I know your chart is wrong because my LG Nexus 4 works fine with it.

Meanwhile Chromecast is a joke. It doesn't work at work because our employee network requires a username and password and our guest network requires a click through agreement. It doesn't work at the hotels I stay at because again, they have a click through agreement. It works about half the time on personal WiFI APs where the person wasn't security conscience enough to turn on client isolation. The thing is nearly useless for me.

Miracast uses WiFi Direct so works trouble free and lag free. Chromecast is some bizarre crappy second computer that has to connect to the network, but has very little capability to actually connect in the real world.

Re: Chromecast now open to developers with the Google Cast SDK

#243

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That isn't accurate. The YouTube app on several TVs (e.g. Samsung) can receive Chromecast streams.

That isn't a Chromecast stream. It is an open standard called DIAL ( http://www.dial-multiscreen.org/ ) Specifically, only Tab casting/full screen casting works to Chromecast. Go ahead and cast your tab/screen to your Samsung TV. I'll wait.

Just as a gee whiz, DIAL is also what is used to send video from the NetFlix phone app to the NetFlix PS3 app.

Re: Chromecast now open to developers with the Google Cast SDK

#244
post #94

Plex ( https://plex.tv/ ) was the magic bullet that unlocked the potential of my Chromecast. I can only recommend it and am looking forward what other applications that come out now ill make it even more useful.

What are you doing with Plex + Chromecast that expands the capabilities of a Chromecast?

Re: Chromecast now open to developers with the Google Cast SDK

#245
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I see this behavoir and I'm betting its an overheating problem. It only happens to me while streaming video

Out of curiosity, how are you powering yours?

Over the USB port on my TV, but I've also powered it with a wallwart

Re: Chromecast now open to developers with the Google Cast SDK

#246

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Really? I don't like spotify compared to iTunes. I can't imagine locking myself into a service for the rest of my life in order to hear music. Once I buy it from iTunes, it's mine to use as I please, it's not locked up in some stupid custom DRM-laden app (which is fairly ironic).

iTunes videos are DRM-ed

Yes, we're discussing music not video.

Re: Chromecast now open to developers with the Google Cast SDK

#247
post #222

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Really? I don't like spotify compared to iTunes. I can't imagine locking myself into a service for the rest of my life in order to hear music. Once I buy it from iTunes, it's mine to use as I please, it's not locked up in some stupid custom DRM-laden app (which is fairly ironic).

I can't imagine locking myself into a service for the rest of my life in order to hear music. But Spotify doesn't lock you into anything.

If I don't pay the monthly fee then I can't listen to albums on my phone. That's pretty much the definition of lock-in.

Re: Chromecast now open to developers with the Google Cast SDK

#248
post #63
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How about use an older Android phone with the sim pulled?

Phones without SIMs can still call 911...

Should be possible to do a custom build without support for the phone part. I've never tried this, but based on the fact that some early Cynaogen ports (As far as I can recall) didn't support dialling via the phone, it should be possible to create a build without the drivers/blobs for enabling the phone part?

Re: Chromecast now open to developers with the Google Cast SDK

#249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is that an advantage over the Apple ecosystem? When I visit my parents I can stream random stuff to their Apple TV or their Airport Expresses without doing anything besides getting on the WiFi network.

Friends or family don't need to have bought into the Apple ecosystem.

Ok, but they need to have bought into the Google ecosystem. I can't stream from my favorite music app to a Chromecast...

That's not really an advantage.

Re: Chromecast now open to developers with the Google Cast SDK

#250
post #94

Plex ( https://plex.tv/ ) was the magic bullet that unlocked the potential of my Chromecast. I can only recommend it and am looking forward what other applications that come out now ill make it even more useful.

What are you doing with Plex + Chromecast that expands the capabilities of a Chromecast?

I can stream my library of videos (no Netflix etc. here in Switzerland) from any of my devices to my Chromecast.
Post reply on HN