Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think so. It's easy now to look at the headline and think "Oh, just another Firefox release, it happens what? once a month?". That's a good thing. Users are upgrading, the process is smooth; Mozilla's having a relatively easy time iterating. Remember when Firefox 3, 4, and 5 came out? Each time, it was a big deal. Many complained and groaned. The upgrade process was problematic for many users. Some users woul…
I would much rather a long-term-stable product with fewer security vulnerabilities that didn't need frequent updates.
Firefox 27 Released
21–30 of 187 posts
Re: Firefox 27 Released
#222013 was such a good hear for Mozilla that I now looked at this release and was thinking - "blah! just another FF release". I then realised what had happened. They have developed so much momentum and such a good track record that I have taken their best product's release for granted...
Is that sarcasm?
Re: Firefox 27 Released
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think so. It's easy now to look at the headline and think "Oh, just another Firefox release, it happens what? once a month?". That's a good thing. Users are upgrading, the process is smooth; Mozilla's having a relatively easy time iterating. Remember when Firefox 3, 4, and 5 came out? Each time, it was a big deal. Many complained and groaned. The upgrade process was problematic for many users. Some users woul…
I would much rather a long-term-stable product with fewer security vulnerabilities that didn't need frequent updates.
Re: Firefox 27 Released
#24[1]https://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firef...
Re: Firefox 27 Released
#25Re: Firefox 27 Released
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think so. It's easy now to look at the headline and think "Oh, just another Firefox release, it happens what? once a month?". That's a good thing. Users are upgrading, the process is smooth; Mozilla's having a relatively easy time iterating. Remember when Firefox 3, 4, and 5 came out? Each time, it was a big deal. Many complained and groaned. The upgrade process was problematic for many users. Some users woul…
I would much rather a long-term-stable product with fewer security vulnerabilities that didn't need frequent updates.
In Forefox's case, the frequent releases more have to do with rapid improvement and iteration than anything. Read the changelog and notice how it was largely a bunch of mid-moderate improvements. Some CSS goodies, some JS goodies, some security goodies.
Re: Firefox 27 Released
#27The glsl shader editor isn't announced in the release notes. It is supposed to be included in FF 27. https://hacks.mozilla.org/2013/11/live-editing-webgl-shaders...
While I'm whining, is it possible to show the console at the same time as viewing the source for files? The fact that I have to switch between the console and source tabs in FF is pretty much the only reason I use Chrome for debugging.
Re: Firefox 27 Released
#28Major browser updates used to be fun. Nowadays they just merge security updates and bump the numbers. Most won't even notice and just complain about the mandatory restart.
Re: Firefox 27 Released
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think so. It's easy now to look at the headline and think "Oh, just another Firefox release, it happens what? once a month?". That's a good thing. Users are upgrading, the process is smooth; Mozilla's having a relatively easy time iterating. Remember when Firefox 3, 4, and 5 came out? Each time, it was a big deal. Many complained and groaned. The upgrade process was problematic for many users. Some users woul…
I would much rather a long-term-stable product with fewer security vulnerabilities that didn't need frequent updates.
Re: Firefox 27 Released
#30What are the market share stats like on FF versions these days? Presumably the auto-update feature means the vast majority are using the latest FF within a few weeks?
(that is taken from a PR5 hospital site, should be pretty indicative of the general market.)