Live data from Hacker News

US Media Blacks Out Snowden Interview

benswann.com

151–160 of 240 posts

Re: US Media Blacks Out Snowden Interview

#151
I find it astounding to think that he's my age. His thoughtfulness and eloquence in circumstances that are nothing short of movie-like are incredible. Although this might not have been a hard-hitting interview that tasked Snowden about the manner and nature of his revelations, what is clear is that he is a definitely a thinker. As much as everyone has his flaws, I can only really thank him for attempting to open up our eyes so that we can get a glimpse of what reality might really be like below the thin veil that perceive around us.

Re: US Media Blacks Out Snowden Interview

#152
post #129

Occam's Razor - Which is more likely? 1) The US government has persuaded major media outlets CNN, FOX, MSNBC, NYT, etc. to bury the interview. 2) The German media company that did the inteview is asking foreign news outlets for more money than they're willing to pay for the interview (and is protecting its copyright by having internet copies taken down).

They can re-air portions of it without paying any money (fair use), right? They do it all the time. Why not this time? And why not discuss it? They discuss findings in scientific journals without reprinting the entire articles, so why not discuss a high-profile interview without re-broadcasting the entire thing?

They can, and they did. For example, the New York Times included 3 minutes of the interview in their writeup 5 days ago:

http://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/thelede/2014/01/29/video-fro...

Re: US Media Blacks Out Snowden Interview

#153
Reddit takedown of this stupid blog post: http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/1wddfp/us_media_bl...

Of course, on the Internet, it's not Occam's Razor that controls, but Godwin's, which states that among competing hypotheses, the hypothesis with the greatest dramatic implications must be selected.

Re: US Media Blacks Out Snowden Interview

#154
post #96
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

These links: a.) lip-service reporting that Snowden was-to-have an interview or b.) reduced the lengthy talk to an inconsequential soundbite. The NYT Blog - 3 days late, is it that hard for such a "renowned" journalistic enterprise? Wow! Props to the Associated Press for writing about something globally noteworthy [sarc.] in an article that few cared to carry or - God-forbid - elaborate upon. (ABC merely picked up th…

"Yes, but what about..." This is moving the goalposts.

[deleted]

Re: US Media Blacks Out Snowden Interview

#155
post #109

With regards to the video not appearing on youtube and many other places. The recording TV station that holds the rights to the interview (ARD /NRD) purposefully blocked international visitors from seeing the video through geo blocking, as they only hold distribution rights in Germany. I assume they would also force youtube to remove the video if it is uploaded to protect their copyright. The details as to why and ho…

Thanks daanlo. I understand and appreciate the concern that others have for this issue, but I wish there was less of a knee-jerk reaction when it comes to these stories. I feel like there many assumptions being made here, as responsible citizens we should be doing our own due diligence to verify the accuracy of articles like this before jumping to conclusions.

That said, we need to keep a sharp eye on the government. No doubt.

Re: US Media Blacks Out Snowden Interview

#156
I submitted a Google translation of the German transcript right after the broadcast and the original English video shortly after that. The submissions didn't get a whole lot of upvotes (2 and 5 respectively). I just figured nobody cared.

The YouTube video is still up and I was told the video was available internationally, though I did not verify that.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7127368

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7130438

Re: US Media Blacks Out Snowden Interview

#157

We need to keep our paranoia in check. That article is B.S. — wrong on all the verifiable points. And the rest is just random guesses. I went and checked the German news (I'm American but lived in Germany 5 years, and am still fluent) and it turns out that ARD screwed the pooch on this one: the two most respected media outlets in Germany are pissed off and have written about ARD's shoddy editing and refusal to provid…

Thank you for taking the time to scope this out. Out of all the posts on this thread, very few people have taken the time to do the research, could be the language barrier of course.

Re: US Media Blacks Out Snowden Interview

#158
post #132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ACCESS.. Journalists depend upon access to government officials to report news on government actions.. No Access to those officials virtually decimates both the Media firm income and the journalists income

This is just so much nonsense. What can they do, deny your press-pass? so what If the whitehouse denies access like that - cutting off some of their own ability to disseminate propaganda - the journalist can simply write on the subject anyway. Even better, while other journalists are busy copying down the usual stuff, the "cut off" journalist can run the "government interfering with the Free Press" story. Loudly. Den…

You are wrong. It's not the press pass it is access to the "unnamed high ranking official" that "leaks" you stories that sell your paper. Not only do you not have breaking stories you don't even have sourced stories. Imagine if WaPo had to write things like "the NYT is reporting...". That's a death knell.

And what do you complain about? That the government is not leaking you information anymore? That anonymous sources aren't taking your calls?

Re: US Media Blacks Out Snowden Interview

#159
post #136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As shown on reddit[1], this hasn't stopped a number of other news organizations from covering it, but the coverage has been very limited. In addition, Fox, MSNBC, and CBS seem to have ignored it completely. It might not be a media blackout, but this is a somewhat significant story (moreso than Bieber being arrested, which I'm certain garnered far more time, even on the political-oriented stations). [1] http://www.red…

MSNBC didn't cover the interview because the entity ceased to exist last year. However, its successor, NBC News, did report the interview...6 days ago when it first came out. http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/26/22454373-snowden-... This was the first result on Google. Fox News reported the AP story here: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/01/26/german-tv-snowden-sa... . CNN covered the story here: http://www.cn…

The partnership that owned msnbc.com ended last year, but the cable channel is still around.

Re: US Media Blacks Out Snowden Interview

#160
If you say:

> The interview has been intentionally blocked from the US public

You need to present some semblance of evidence that that's the case. I will grant that it's interesting that this hasn't been covered in the US, but this article is a suspicion being presented as a proven fact.

Post reply on HN