Live data from Hacker News

Google Drops Discussions Search Filter and Others

seroundtable.com

1–10 of 86 posts

Re: Google Drops Discussions Search Filter and Others

#7
post #4

If this isn't ironic, I don't know what is.

Why ironic?

Google (which started as a search engine, way back when dinosaurs roamed the Earth) is now increasingly working on _narrowing down_ the search options available to users.

Re: Google Drops Discussions Search Filter and Others

#8
The promise was that, as search engines get better, there would be no need for bookmarking and downloading, since all the content in the world is only one sloppy search query away.

Somehow, I seem to have ignored this stubbornly and instead bookmarked pages, downloaded videos and copied strings (!) out of the web for years.

Not that it did me much good, I now have thousands of inconsistently sorted bookmarks and a bunch of directories filled with assorted data.

What this article tells me (again), is that because you can't trust search engines to behave in a predictable manner, you can't even be sure you'll be able to find the stuff that you know is online.

Re: Google Drops Discussions Search Filter and Others

#9
Any alternatives? I asked about this two days ago but got no answers: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7124132

Also, I know that "?tbm=dsc" works but I expect the quality of the results to start falling (it already has for a while) since Google probably isn't going to work to improve the filter.

Re: Google Drops Discussions Search Filter and Others

#10
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why ironic?

Google (which started as a search engine, way back when dinosaurs roamed the Earth) is now increasingly working on _narrowing down_ the search options available to users.

I need more clarification on how this is ironic.
Post reply on HN