I'm not so sure iterating like crazy is a good thing.
How Angular Lets Us Iterate Like Crazy
21–30 of 50 posts
Re: How Angular Lets Us Iterate Like Crazy
#22Is this website the result of your crazy iterations? http://i.imgur.com/jqy2kwo.png
Re: How Angular Lets Us Iterate Like Crazy
#23"She" is becoming such a gimmick now.
Given the english language requires a gender-specific pronoun (I grew up saying "They" to the chagrin of my teacher) it always makes me a little bit happy to see She in texts. As a woman it makes you realise how much you don't see it. So it stops being a gimmick once the powers that be let us use a non-gendered pronoun ("they" is perfectly fine to me). Or we see a 50/50 split and rewrite the history books accordingly…
This is definitely bad for readability, the user, and all that. Please, anyone reading this who complains about line-heights and font-sizes, pay attention to grammar as well.
Re: How Angular Lets Us Iterate Like Crazy
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Given the english language requires a gender-specific pronoun (I grew up saying "They" to the chagrin of my teacher) it always makes me a little bit happy to see She in texts. As a woman it makes you realise how much you don't see it. So it stops being a gimmick once the powers that be let us use a non-gendered pronoun ("they" is perfectly fine to me). Or we see a 50/50 split and rewrite the history books accordingly…
When I see "she" it makes me reflexively stop and look back to make sure I haven't missed something, wondering, "who is this 'she', I must have skipped the paragraph introducing the subject." This is definitely bad for readability, the user, and all that. Please, anyone reading this who complains about line-heights and font-sizes, pay attention to grammar as well.
It's just awkward, please stop with the forced gender equality if that's what that is. If it's just being playful then I guess you can shrug it off.
Re: How Angular Lets Us Iterate Like Crazy
#25I have been looking into Angular, however I am yet to find it any productive gain as being told here. From what I was able to find out, there isn't any UI component framework available for Angular with the same set of components offering as jQuery has. For developer teams that haven't a clue about CSS dark magic as guys with designer background have, this is a big impediment to use Angular. I have looked into UI Boot…
Re: How Angular Lets Us Iterate Like Crazy
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
Given the english language requires a gender-specific pronoun (I grew up saying "They" to the chagrin of my teacher) it always makes me a little bit happy to see She in texts. As a woman it makes you realise how much you don't see it. So it stops being a gimmick once the powers that be let us use a non-gendered pronoun ("they" is perfectly fine to me). Or we see a 50/50 split and rewrite the history books accordingly…
When I see "she" it makes me reflexively stop and look back to make sure I haven't missed something, wondering, "who is this 'she', I must have skipped the paragraph introducing the subject." This is definitely bad for readability, the user, and all that. Please, anyone reading this who complains about line-heights and font-sizes, pay attention to grammar as well.
Re: How Angular Lets Us Iterate Like Crazy
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
Look at angular-ui. A lot of people just invoke jQuery from directives. Sometimes I catch myself doing it from the controller, although that is definitely bad practice.
Thanks for the reply. Angula-UI seems a bit too simple in terms of available set of components. I got the idea that although you can use jQuery, it is an anti-pattern and not guaranteed to always work. At least from what I could find in SO and blogs. My main problem is that I and many others in our teams, don't have any problem doing native UIs, but always get lost in the HTML/CSS/JavaScript jungle without designer h…
Only jQuery haters say that. jQuery is totally compatible with Angular,and Angular ships with its own jQuery lite, replaced by jQuery when available. The only thing you need to do is wrap jQuery calls into a directive. I use jQuery and plugins all the time with Angular, never had a problem ,as long i dont call jQuery from a controller , only in directives.
Re: How Angular Lets Us Iterate Like Crazy
#28I'm not so sure iterating like crazy is a good thing.
Well, the alternative is working for days / weeks on a feature that the end-user may not even use (is the message I'm getting from this article). Being able to create and alter a feature quickly is important in an agile environment.
Re: How Angular Lets Us Iterate Like Crazy
#29I have been looking into Angular, however I am yet to find it any productive gain as being told here. From what I was able to find out, there isn't any UI component framework available for Angular with the same set of components offering as jQuery has. For developer teams that haven't a clue about CSS dark magic as guys with designer background have, this is a big impediment to use Angular. I have looked into UI Boot…
If by work in progress you mean that it's not ready to be used, then you're mistaken. I use it in my current project a lot (started 6+ months ago).
Re: How Angular Lets Us Iterate Like Crazy
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Given the english language requires a gender-specific pronoun (I grew up saying "They" to the chagrin of my teacher) it always makes me a little bit happy to see She in texts. As a woman it makes you realise how much you don't see it. So it stops being a gimmick once the powers that be let us use a non-gendered pronoun ("they" is perfectly fine to me). Or we see a 50/50 split and rewrite the history books accordingly…
When I see "she" it makes me reflexively stop and look back to make sure I haven't missed something, wondering, "who is this 'she', I must have skipped the paragraph introducing the subject." This is definitely bad for readability, the user, and all that. Please, anyone reading this who complains about line-heights and font-sizes, pay attention to grammar as well.
"The developer refuses. She’s worked too hard on Feature X, and dammit, you’ll have to pry it from her cold dead hands!!!"
With the exception of the unnecessary extra !! I don't see what is wrong with the grammer, it's clear in this context that "she" is the developer.