Live data from Hacker News

Tarkovsky Films Free Online (2010)

openculture.com

1–10 of 53 posts

Re: Tarkovsky Films Free Online (2010)

#2
Watching Stalker may forever alter your taste in cinematography, it's so beautiful. Solaris is also good (watching it back to back with the Clooney remake is an interesting experience); Lem pretty much hated all three adaptations (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solaris_(novel)), an adaptation that reflects the alienness that he wanted to underline would be an interesting movie. You might want to think about what repressed personification would confront you if you had traveled to Solaris.

Re: Tarkovsky Films Free Online (2010)

#3
Tarkovsky is my favorite 20th century film director bar none. Here's are some reasons why and why you might also be interested in his films:

(1) He described his art as poetry applied to cinema or "sculpting in time," a fundamentally different conceptual idea of the cinematic art that he went to a great length to clarify (in a book of the same name, highly recommended).

(2) His use of color is incredible. Some films, especially stalker, are near black and white with incredibly vibrant and poignant uses of green. This is a bit like Bergman at his best, but even better.

(3) He was deeply religious in a "mystical" sense, with a lot of respect for past traditions, but not in a dogmatic sense and with appreciation for both Christian and pagan elements (see Andrei Rublev for both aspects)

(4) He knew other European traditions extremely well. Ivan's childhood is a meditation on the war with Germany, including shots of Duehrer's prints. Nostalgia involves his time in Italy traditions including Madonna cults and important artwork. Sacrifice has Shakespearean references, Rembrandt, Japanese samurai, and magical traditions. In general, his films are full of long shots of important pieces of Renaissance art with profound meaning.

(5) He spent a lot of time thinking about the integration of technology and the rest of life. Solaris is the futuristic spaceship version of this. Stalker is the apocalyptic version of this.

I think in a century Tarkovsky will rightly be credited as inventing a whole new type of cinema, his way of approaching it was fundamentally in tune with a "mystical" sense and integrated with other forms of visual art (i.e. the long gaze you have at a painting), and the punctuated, rhythmic reading of poetry.

Re: Tarkovsky Films Free Online (2010)

#4
post #3

Tarkovsky is my favorite 20th century film director bar none. Here's are some reasons why and why you might also be interested in his films: (1) He described his art as poetry applied to cinema or "sculpting in time," a fundamentally different conceptual idea of the cinematic art that he went to a great length to clarify (in a book of the same name, highly recommended). (2) His use of color is incredible. Some films,…

"Sculpting in time" -- what a great expression. The lorry scene in stalker is what I think of when I hear that.

Re: Tarkovsky Films Free Online (2010)

#5
Excerpt [1] Tarkovsky's "Nostalgia"[2]:

‘What are you reading?’ Gorchakov asks, unexpectedly.

‘Tarkovsky ... Poems by Arseny Tarkovsky.’ Eugenia looks a little taken aback, as though caught red-handed.

‘In Russian?’

‘No, it’s a translation ... A pretty good one ...’

‘Chuck them out.’

‘What for? ... Actually, the person who translated them, he’s an amazing poet, in his own right ...’ she says, as though trying to justify herself.

‘Poetry can’t be translated ... Art in general is untranslatable ...’

[1] http://www.stanford.edu/dept/DLCL/cgi-bin/web/files/skakov_t...

[2] http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086022/

Re: Tarkovsky Films Free Online (2010)

#6
post #3

Tarkovsky is my favorite 20th century film director bar none. Here's are some reasons why and why you might also be interested in his films: (1) He described his art as poetry applied to cinema or "sculpting in time," a fundamentally different conceptual idea of the cinematic art that he went to a great length to clarify (in a book of the same name, highly recommended). (2) His use of color is incredible. Some films,…

"Sculpting in time" is also the title of Tarkovsky's book which I haven't read, but I now have a new impetus to do so.

Interesting about colour - perhaps a "less is more" thing. The end of Andrei Rublev is breathtaking, for instance.

I saw Mirror three times at the cinema, and there are not many flicks I can say that about.

Re: Tarkovsky Films Free Online (2010)

#7
post #2

Watching Stalker may forever alter your taste in cinematography, it's so beautiful. Solaris is also good (watching it back to back with the Clooney remake is an interesting experience); Lem pretty much hated all three adaptations ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solaris_(novel) ), an adaptation that reflects the alienness that he wanted to underline would be an interesting movie. You might want to think about what repr…

Both Tarkovsky and Soderbergh have almost completely missed the point of Solaris, the book. The book is about communication, or failure to do so. It's a great book to read, highly recommend.

Re: Tarkovsky Films Free Online (2010)

#8
post #3

Tarkovsky is my favorite 20th century film director bar none. Here's are some reasons why and why you might also be interested in his films: (1) He described his art as poetry applied to cinema or "sculpting in time," a fundamentally different conceptual idea of the cinematic art that he went to a great length to clarify (in a book of the same name, highly recommended). (2) His use of color is incredible. Some films,…

> (2) His use of color is incredible. Some films, especially stalker, are near black and white with incredibly vibrant and poignant uses of green.

Actually the first part of Stalker was (re)shot in black and white because they damaged some part of the original film reel. After about 40 minutes or so into the movie it switches to color.

The tint you're talking about is a technique created by Tarkovsky which alters the film temperature: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079944/trivia?ref_=tt_ql_2

Re: Tarkovsky Films Free Online (2010)

#9
post #7
post #2

Watching Stalker may forever alter your taste in cinematography, it's so beautiful. Solaris is also good (watching it back to back with the Clooney remake is an interesting experience); Lem pretty much hated all three adaptations ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solaris_(novel) ), an adaptation that reflects the alienness that he wanted to underline would be an interesting movie. You might want to think about what repr…

Both Tarkovsky and Soderbergh have almost completely missed the point of Solaris, the book. The book is about communication, or failure to do so. It's a great book to read, highly recommend.

Tarkovsky made films about what he cared about and what interested him. His Solaris wasn't really meant to be about Lem's book, just as his Stalker isn't about Roadside Picnic. Those books simply offer a setting where he could explore his own ideas.

Re: Tarkovsky Films Free Online (2010)

#10
post #7
post #2

Watching Stalker may forever alter your taste in cinematography, it's so beautiful. Solaris is also good (watching it back to back with the Clooney remake is an interesting experience); Lem pretty much hated all three adaptations ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solaris_(novel) ), an adaptation that reflects the alienness that he wanted to underline would be an interesting movie. You might want to think about what repr…

Both Tarkovsky and Soderbergh have almost completely missed the point of Solaris, the book. The book is about communication, or failure to do so. It's a great book to read, highly recommend.

I disagree with you on that. While I haven't seen Soderbergh's version (I am too much in love with T's) I think the idea of communication is deeply embedded: he's saying, we can't communicate with ourselves - how could we possibly communicate with an alien non-humanoid entity? I think he makes that really clear.

For anyone who hasn't watched his films: take an afternoon you have nothing to do and slow down. It's not a passive experience and you need to relax to take it all in. Amazing stuff that I can't imagine not having in my life, plus all the great directors he influenced. Him and Bergman == life of film.

Post reply on HN