Live data from Hacker News

Announcing the Female Founders Conference (March 1)

blog.ycombinator.com

31–40 of 295 posts

Re: Announcing the Female Founders Conference (March 1)

#31
post #26

Fantastic! Will this be streamed? For women not based in Bay Area (and therefore realistically women with even more limited access to female tech/entrepreneur role-models), this would be a great resource to be accessed remotely and real time, and could definitely be the catalyst for some quality Twitterverse discussion/encouragement for female tech entrepreneurs.

Yes, we are planning to stream this. Check out the conference site closer to March 1 for more details.

Re: Announcing the Female Founders Conference (March 1)

#32
post #18

I'm against these, because I'm against gender discrimination. Gender discrimination means that one gender is treated differently from another. It's also interesting to know whether transwomen will be allowed. Some radical feminists only accept 'born as women' to their conferences. And if transwomen are accepted, what's their definition of that.

> Gender discrimination means that one gender is treated differently from another. Yes, it does. Think on that more deeply.

Are you trying to imply two wrongs makes a right?

Re: Announcing the Female Founders Conference (March 1)

#34
post #18

I'm against these, because I'm against gender discrimination. Gender discrimination means that one gender is treated differently from another. It's also interesting to know whether transwomen will be allowed. Some radical feminists only accept 'born as women' to their conferences. And if transwomen are accepted, what's their definition of that.

> Some radical feminists only accept 'born as women' to their conferences. And if transwomen are accepted, what's their definition of that. Really. That's interesting. I know... a few feminists 'round these parts who might be characterized "radical." Can't think of anyone getting their hate on against trans women. And I don't know why you would raise such a specter of exclusion with no basis.

I have never heard of such a thing in a conference context, but I have seen it come up in others. And I don't think it's helpful to label such exclusion "hate", as it typically comes from women who feel that self-identifying as female is not sufficient to qualify one to be called a woman.

But it's a very complex and interesting issue, not worth bringing up here, as you note. It's brought up here to stir the pot, I seriously doubt GP actually cares about transpeople at all.

[Edited later: for what it's worth, I regret choosing the word "typically" above. "Sometimes" or "often" would have been more appropriate word choices]

Re: Announcing the Female Founders Conference (March 1)

#37
post #13

While we're on the topic of conferences that target a specific slice, does anyone know if there's something like an Immigrant Founders Conference? That sounds like another demographic that has huge potential and could use some pretty specific kinds of help.

Wouldn't that just be a Founders Conference? :) Joking! As an immigrant founder, I can think of a couple of key issues may have been different for me than a resident founder: immigration laws and their impact on startups (obviously) and to some degree, context - understanding customers well, even when you did not grow up in the same context as them.

Yes. At last year's startup conference, the pitch winner was from Spain. We had people from Italy, Singapore, and even Texas :-)

Re: Announcing the Female Founders Conference (March 1)

#38
post #29
post #25

Can males attend this conference? I do see an option for Male in the drop down but I figured it's best to ask...

We want to give priority to women, since we have limited space.

Understood. Already signed up but feel free to remove me from attendance.

Re: Announcing the Female Founders Conference (March 1)

#39
post #18

I'm against these, because I'm against gender discrimination. Gender discrimination means that one gender is treated differently from another. It's also interesting to know whether transwomen will be allowed. Some radical feminists only accept 'born as women' to their conferences. And if transwomen are accepted, what's their definition of that.

> Our goal with this conference is to inspire women to start (or hang in there with!) a startup through the insights and experiences of those who have done it already. If you're a woman interested in learning more about startups, I encourage you to apply.

How is that discriminatory? You can't argue that women are widely represented in entrepreneurship (heck, it's an even smaller percentage than in development.) Startup School has always been 99% men. I'm personally super excited about a conference with women who've dealt with the issues I have as a female founder.

Re: Announcing the Female Founders Conference (March 1)

#40
post #30

I'm assuming some HNers are soon to arrive saying things like "why does it matter that a founder is a female?", "why make an excluding event? isn't it sexism all the same", "imagine if someone make a 'male founders conference'?" I would like to ask you to think for a moment, before raising this concerns (I am not bothering here to debate with haters, only with those who are genuinely concerned that this might sexism…

I agree with you so much that I broke my mouse clicking the upvote arrow. I'm also glad that ycombinator is doing this because it shows YC's official stance, as an organization , supports these kinds of events regardless of all the commentators trying to detract from them.
Post reply on HN