2014 Gates Annual Letter: Myths that block progress for the poor
annualletter.gatesfoundation.org
2014 Gates Annual Letter: Myths that block progress for the poor
1–10 of 317 posts
Re: 2014 Gates Annual Letter: Myths that block progress for the poor
#2Re: 2014 Gates Annual Letter: Myths that block progress for the poor
#3I think myth number 3, that saving children’s lives leads to overpopulation, misses the central concern. People are concerned about world resource depletion, not overpopulation. And while it is 100% true that bringing countries out of poverty reduces population growth, it does not reduce consumption. In fact, it does the opposite.
It doesn't miss the central concern, it reasons through it within some reasonable moral framework.
Re: 2014 Gates Annual Letter: Myths that block progress for the poor
#4Overall I enjoyed his letter, but I find this quote a bit deceptive. A recent photo (http://i.imgur.com/atxDiw6.jpg) of the poverty line in Mexico City paints a very different picture than Gates' conclusion that most people there are "middle-class." Another source (http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/30/us-mexico-poverty-...) claims that Mexico's poverty line is nearly 50%, far different than "pockets of poverty."
Re: 2014 Gates Annual Letter: Myths that block progress for the poor
#5I suppose I'm one of the 0% (rounded) who disagree with putting contraception in this list. When this gets thrown around, it makes me feel like an outsider in a programming community where I otherwise agree with probably everything else.
Re: 2014 Gates Annual Letter: Myths that block progress for the poor
#6Re: 2014 Gates Annual Letter: Myths that block progress for the poor
#7I kept coming back to one thought while reading this: why are people so mistaken about Africa in particular? The article covers misconceptions all over the place, but it keeps coming back to Africa, and it seems that the disparity between what people think and what's actually the case is far larger there than anywhere else.
It would be easy to blame this on casual racism and move on. And I'm sure that's a factor. But there must be more.
I wonder if there might just be a cliff effect in people's perceptions. The perception of China, for example, changed rapidly from "shithole" to "where all our stuff is made". India quickly switched from "shithole" to "where our IT gets outsourced". (And reminder, I'm talking about perceptions here, specifically in the US, or possibly the western world as a whole.) I wasn't around for it, but I have the impression that more or less the same thing happened for e.g. Taiwan and Japan.
If that's the case, then Africa is still in the "shithole" perception category simply because we don't see much of them. Not much of our stuff comes with a "Made in Kenya" label on it, and our experience with IT-related outsourcing to Africa is mostly limited to Nigerian scammers. Once that changes, the perception will rapidly go from "those guys have no food" to "those guys are taking all of our jobs".
A counterpoint would be South America, which is not overall perceived as "shithole" but nor is it a place we interact with a whole lot.
Perhaps it's just mental inertia. The places that are changing most rapidly will be the most incorrectly perceived.
Re: 2014 Gates Annual Letter: Myths that block progress for the poor
#8"Creating societies where people enjoy basic health, relative prosperity, fundamental equality, and access to contraceptives is the only way to secure a sustainable world." I suppose I'm one of the 0% (rounded) who disagree with putting contraception in this list. When this gets thrown around, it makes me feel like an outsider in a programming community where I otherwise agree with probably everything else.
Providing contraception (especially condoms) can prevent STDs in addition to preventing unwanted child birth.
Re: 2014 Gates Annual Letter: Myths that block progress for the poor
#9"Creating societies where people enjoy basic health, relative prosperity, fundamental equality, and access to contraceptives is the only way to secure a sustainable world." I suppose I'm one of the 0% (rounded) who disagree with putting contraception in this list. When this gets thrown around, it makes me feel like an outsider in a programming community where I otherwise agree with probably everything else.
There are only two ways to accomplish this: having fewer children, or killing more people. The latter is what has historically dominated, but we've become so much better at keeping people alive in the last couple of centuries or so that it's no longer working. That aside, many people find that solution to be tasteless.
That leaves having fewer children. Contraception is the only way to accomplish this. Yes, technically it is possible to accomplish this by avoiding sex. But socially, this doesn't work, because people simply don't do that. Contraception, however, does work.
It's the only available solution to a serious problem, and that's why it's on the list.