Earlier quoted context omitted.
> He plots and schemes way to put hundreds of millions of dollars into his pocket off of the works of others. And the way the recording industry works is any different?
Except artists voluntarily sign contracts with RIAA. Doubt Kim's service pays anything to the artists at all.
Kim Dotcom's new music streaming service
51–60 of 107 posts
Re: Kim Dotcom's new music streaming service
#52Fuck Kim Dotcom. He's a scumbag piece of shit who deserves to rot in prison. He plots and schemes way to put hundreds of millions of dollars into his pocket off of the works of others. Anyone who supports him should be ashamed of themselves.
Shady acts on the side of FBI, police and other government agencies are way more dangerous for democracy and rule of law then whatever Kim Dotcom did.
The same goes for criminalization of copyright law, whether by precedent or brought law changes.
Re: Kim Dotcom's new music streaming service
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
> He plots and schemes way to put hundreds of millions of dollars into his pocket off of the works of others. And the way the recording industry works is any different?
The recording industry at least doesn't run an underground BBS and sells out its users to law enforcement to save itself after being raided. Kimble has always been a self-centred scumbag. I really don't understand why anybody ever trust him again with anything.
Re: Kim Dotcom's new music streaming service
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
> He plots and schemes way to put hundreds of millions of dollars into his pocket off of the works of others. And the way the recording industry works is any different?
Two wrongs make a right, right?
Re: Kim Dotcom's new music streaming service
#55Auto-tune is a cool technology but I liked it better when tone-deaf rich people couldn't flatly sing a poorly-written, over-produced song and call it music.
Re: Kim Dotcom's new music streaming service
#56I'm assuming Kim hasn't coded this himself, anyone know if he outsourced to a company?
Re: Kim Dotcom's new music streaming service
#57Fuck Kim Dotcom. He's a scumbag piece of shit who deserves to rot in prison. He plots and schemes way to put hundreds of millions of dollars into his pocket off of the works of others. Anyone who supports him should be ashamed of themselves.
> He plots and schemes way to put hundreds of millions of dollars into his pocket off of the works of others. And the way the recording industry works is any different?
"And the way the VC industry works is any different?"
Re: Kim Dotcom's new music streaming service
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
Except artists voluntarily sign contracts with RIAA. Doubt Kim's service pays anything to the artists at all.
"voluntarily"
Re: Kim Dotcom's new music streaming service
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
From what Courtney Love said, that's not really true. Well selling records can actually put the artist in debt. The best venue for artist to earn money are tours and merchandise.
"... selling records can actually put the artist in debt." Yes, of course. It's no different than startups - if you take on $500,000 debt to start your business (a.k.a. make an album, promote the album), you will be in debt until you sell enough product to pay off said debt. The best venue for artist to earn money are tours and merchandise. A good new year's resolution for us all is to "Stop talking about stuff you d…
I'm not saying they make lots of lots of money of merchandising and tours, but from what I've gathered they make more of money on those, unless the studio contract takes part of that as well. Basically they earn more money on a merchandise they are on, or a product line they sell than on records.
Your metaphor is more like starting a startup to get famous enough to start another startup to pay the debts of the previous one.