Live data from Hacker News

Kim Dotcom's new music streaming service

baboom.com

51–60 of 107 posts

Re: Kim Dotcom's new music streaming service

#51
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> He plots and schemes way to put hundreds of millions of dollars into his pocket off of the works of others. And the way the recording industry works is any different?

Except artists voluntarily sign contracts with RIAA. Doubt Kim's service pays anything to the artists at all.

"voluntarily"

Re: Kim Dotcom's new music streaming service

#52

Fuck Kim Dotcom. He's a scumbag piece of shit who deserves to rot in prison. He plots and schemes way to put hundreds of millions of dollars into his pocket off of the works of others. Anyone who supports him should be ashamed of themselves.

Generally speaking, people should be put in prison only if the prosecution can legally prove they did something illegal. "I totally know he is a scumbag" cause "some unrelated stuff that was totally shade" is not considered proof.

Shady acts on the side of FBI, police and other government agencies are way more dangerous for democracy and rule of law then whatever Kim Dotcom did.

The same goes for criminalization of copyright law, whether by precedent or brought law changes.

Re: Kim Dotcom's new music streaming service

#53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> He plots and schemes way to put hundreds of millions of dollars into his pocket off of the works of others. And the way the recording industry works is any different?

The recording industry at least doesn't run an underground BBS and sells out its users to law enforcement to save itself after being raided. Kimble has always been a self-centred scumbag. I really don't understand why anybody ever trust him again with anything.

You can judge someone both on their merits and vices. Both Mega and this Baboom are pretty awesome and technically amazing. I'm listening to his album right now, and it's actually really catchy and enjoyable. The man has many talents, and he is using them for good at the moment. I'd say the U.S. government is way worse than someone who is 'self-centered.' The U.S. is a war machine, Dotcom is conceited. Now who should we be concerned about, heh.

Re: Kim Dotcom's new music streaming service

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> He plots and schemes way to put hundreds of millions of dollars into his pocket off of the works of others. And the way the recording industry works is any different?

Two wrongs make a right, right?

I think the point of contention is this: if the artist isn't getting paid by the record company for music sales, is ripping it off from them even wrong?

Re: Kim Dotcom's new music streaming service

#55
The demo site works well and feels slick. It's a pity I had to listen to his music to try it out though.

Auto-tune is a cool technology but I liked it better when tone-deaf rich people couldn't flatly sing a poorly-written, over-produced song and call it music.

Re: Kim Dotcom's new music streaming service

#57

Fuck Kim Dotcom. He's a scumbag piece of shit who deserves to rot in prison. He plots and schemes way to put hundreds of millions of dollars into his pocket off of the works of others. Anyone who supports him should be ashamed of themselves.

> He plots and schemes way to put hundreds of millions of dollars into his pocket off of the works of others. And the way the recording industry works is any different?

> And the way the recording industry works is any different?

"And the way the VC industry works is any different?"

Re: Kim Dotcom's new music streaming service

#58
post #51
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Except artists voluntarily sign contracts with RIAA. Doubt Kim's service pays anything to the artists at all.

"voluntarily"

Yes, voluntarily. People would kill to get these ostensibly terrible recording ontracts. Because, statistically speaking, the alternatives for artists are to 1) starve to make their music or 2) get another job. Playing live does not make real money to any but the small fraction who are already famous, and guess how they got there in the first place!

Re: Kim Dotcom's new music streaming service

#59
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From what Courtney Love said, that's not really true. Well selling records can actually put the artist in debt. The best venue for artist to earn money are tours and merchandise.

"... selling records can actually put the artist in debt." Yes, of course. It's no different than startups - if you take on $500,000 debt to start your business (a.k.a. make an album, promote the album), you will be in debt until you sell enough product to pay off said debt. The best venue for artist to earn money are tours and merchandise. A good new year's resolution for us all is to "Stop talking about stuff you d…

Hey another good new year's resolution is to "Don't talking condescending unless you have something valuable to contribute". I.e. give me data showing I'm wrong.

I'm not saying they make lots of lots of money of merchandising and tours, but from what I've gathered they make more of money on those, unless the studio contract takes part of that as well. Basically they earn more money on a merchandise they are on, or a product line they sell than on records.

Your metaphor is more like starting a startup to get famous enough to start another startup to pay the debts of the previous one.

Re: Kim Dotcom's new music streaming service

#60
I'm not sure if anyone actually listened to his album but the production on it is pretty solid. I would love to know who made most of this. It sounds like all the pop EDM garbage thats out there right now. A lot of the lyrical content is totally in that realm of meaningless phrases about life and partying. Songs like Keep Getting Better could have me fooled that it was a Rihanna song (really both of the girls Amari and Ilati sounded autotuned like her).
Post reply on HN