Live data from Hacker News

Tell HN: Server Status

news.ycombinator.com

41–50 of 124 posts

Re: Tell HN: Server Status

#41
Assuming the disk footprint is small...

Would recommend a new SSD-based ZFS box (Samsung 840 Pros have been great even for pretty write-intesive load), with raidz3 for protection and zfs send (and/or rsync from hourly/N-minute snapshot for data protection which should eliminate copying FS metadata corruption, as not sure if zfs send will).

Happy to provide and/or host such a box or two if helpful.

Re: Tell HN: Server Status

#42
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

this sort of legacy thinking That's the kind of facile statement that makes people riotously mock the entire startup community, like "MongoDB is webscale" but even less valid. Cloud services are not a panacea, and there are myriad situations in which running one's own infrastructure can be a good idea. What matters is that the issues and benefits are taken into account; if one can show research demonstrating that a c…

The advantage of cloud servers is if one experiences corruption or goes down you just kill it and start a new one. If your cloudy EBS equivalent experiences corruption, you restore from snapshot and off you go again. Either way it involves less downtime than HN seems to have. The downside is it costs more (usually, depends on how high your server management and data center overheads are.) I'd like to point out that d…

You realize cloud services are vulnerable to data loss as well?[1] The cloud isn't some magic machine off in a datacenter somewhere. Its a bunch of servers and SANs just like what you or I would roll out if we needed bare metal infrastructure. The only difference is the extraordinary markup that you're paying amazon to use their servers.

[1]http://blogs.computerworld.com/18198/oops_amazon_web_service...

Re: Tell HN: Server Status

#44
post #38
post #7

may i ask where are the machines hosted? is that on AWS? if not, why don't you move to a more reliable hosting, like AWS?

>if not, why don't you move to a more reliable hosting, like AWS? Ah yes, because AWS has worked out so well for the reddit folk. :-)

Reddit is also a couple orders more active than HN. Also I thought Reddit's AWS issues were resolved years ago.

Re: Tell HN: Server Status

#46
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

this sort of legacy thinking That's the kind of facile statement that makes people riotously mock the entire startup community, like "MongoDB is webscale" but even less valid. Cloud services are not a panacea, and there are myriad situations in which running one's own infrastructure can be a good idea. What matters is that the issues and benefits are taken into account; if one can show research demonstrating that a c…

The advantage of cloud servers is if one experiences corruption or goes down you just kill it and start a new one. If your cloudy EBS equivalent experiences corruption, you restore from snapshot and off you go again. Either way it involves less downtime than HN seems to have. The downside is it costs more (usually, depends on how high your server management and data center overheads are.) I'd like to point out that d…

Yeah you can do private cloud as well. Docker lets you do that. It can cost a bit of money in the effort spent but payoff in the long run usually worth it - at scale.

Re: Tell HN: Server Status

#47

I'm sure it has been asked many times before, but I'd love to hear the latest thinking... Why in 2013 is HN still running on bespoke hardware and software? If a startup came to you with this sort of legacy thinking you'd laugh them out of the room.

If HN was on AWS, where would we go to discuss AWS outages?

Re: Tell HN: Server Status

#50
Thanks for the update. No worries, it's just a news message board and no businesses are hurt when it's down. I quite enjoy seeing how these things are solved and I'm sure all will be forgiven if you post a meaty post-mortem.
Post reply on HN