> This is not news. If you're numb to it, then it's imperative that it is news. Imagine when the headlines read "Millions killed in Nazi camps" and people said "This is not news."
Godwin's Law
we don't need to go far back.
the most shocking realisation for me about the Snowden leaks was how apathetic people were toward their own civil liberties.
If you actually go to http://coursetable.com you will be asked to login through Yale Central Authentication Service, which sends you to: https://secure.its.yale.edu/cas/login?service=http%3A%2F%2Fc... I hope I don't give the administration any good ideas here, but I would seem that they have a much more efficient way to disable the site.
Yes, but CAS is a single sign-on system likely used throughout their internal network, so they're probably not able to disable it without disrupting authentication to a large number of other unrelated systems.
One of the principal issues raised here - and not squarely addressed in the post or the article to which it links - is the extent to which average subjective ratings of courses and professors should be permitted to dominate the decision-making processes of students. Note that Yale's complaint included concerns over "the prominence of class and professor ratings", and the student developers' response was to remove "th…
Yale has the same student feedback/rating data available in their official online coursebook. From what I understand, ybbplus/coursetable was simply aggregating it in a way that made it easier for students to use. If there is something fundamentally wrong with subjective ratings, it seems strange that Yale would provide it in one context and censor it in another.
There is no way that a valid copyright claim can be made over the underlying data because it is a statement of fact . Such a work is not eligible for copyright protection.
I thought my school was bad but reading this makes the administration at my school look like angels. When I launched a similar service at UNC Chapel Hill, the IT dept blocked requests from my server to theirs for scraping latest data. They claimed I was creating excess load, which is silly because if they really did the math, given how many people were using my service I was probably saving them resources.
One of the principal issues raised here - and not squarely addressed in the post or the article to which it links - is the extent to which average subjective ratings of courses and professors should be permitted to dominate the decision-making processes of students. Note that Yale's complaint included concerns over "the prominence of class and professor ratings", and the student developers' response was to remove "th…
While there's potentially a debate to have over that topic (I'm sure the creators and some users of this site disagree with those concerns), the University's decision to censor the site strikes me as far less defensible than the existence of the site itself. So respectfully the fact that there's "more to the story" on that basis alone isn't terribly salient.
I thought my school was bad but reading this makes the administration at my school look like angels. When I launched a similar service at UNC Chapel Hill, the IT dept blocked requests from my server to theirs for scraping latest data. They claimed I was creating excess load, which is silly because if they really did the math, given how many people were using my service I was probably saving them resources.
Some students at my university created a website to turn your timetable into a file that could be imported into a calendar app by screen scraping the timetabling website. The University actually helped out with hosting it and providing access to their SSO system. Win win.