Network tab: 1410 requests | 51.4 MB transferred | 2.0 min (load: 1.2 min, DOMContentLoaded: 4.29s)
Console: 15 errors, 12 warningsNew brand site for Sony uses rendered JPG frames for 3D parallax scrolling
41–50 of 105 posts
Re: New brand site for Sony uses rendered JPG frames for 3D parallax scrolling
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
[deleted]
Chris, I don't agree, it's you that should be ashamed: Expletives say the most about those who use them, not much about anything else.
Re: New brand site for Sony uses rendered JPG frames for 3D parallax scrolling
#43Re: New brand site for Sony uses rendered JPG frames for 3D parallax scrolling
#44Very choppy and hard to go back. On the plus side, I didn't know about these "Smartphone Attachable Lens-Style Camera", is there someone here able to tell me if it is worth it? (I have a Galaxy Note and no other camera).
Like many other verticals there are many technological innovations happening in photography too. This "smartphone attachable lens-style camera" is one of these recent innovations. I can't comment on quality of the lens itself but they must be far better than that of a standard camera installed on mobile phones. These lenses can be used both attached/detached to the mobile phone. They use NFC (if your phone is into th…
Re: New brand site for Sony uses rendered JPG frames for 3D parallax scrolling
#45Re: New brand site for Sony uses rendered JPG frames for 3D parallax scrolling
#46What their site, their opening punchline, the responsive design problems, and the slowness make me feel is that they're overly focussed on superficial form at the expense of deeper functionality.
Re: New brand site for Sony uses rendered JPG frames for 3D parallax scrolling
#47Re: New brand site for Sony uses rendered JPG frames for 3D parallax scrolling
#48Re: New brand site for Sony uses rendered JPG frames for 3D parallax scrolling
#49Re: New brand site for Sony uses rendered JPG frames for 3D parallax scrolling
#50The animations are nice, but they are basically doing frame by frame 704 × 396 movie that look terrible when pushed to 1920 wide.
Just use a proper video format, which is much more efficient.