Live data from Hacker News

Obama administration to end contract with company behind HealthCare.gov

washingtonpost.com

1–10 of 54 posts

Re: Obama administration to end contract with company behind HealthCare.gov

#2
Too many lies in this article to take more from this than the bare fact that CGI Federal will be replaced by Accenture (the latter of which is no prize from what I've heard).

I.e. the government's Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) were notoriously the "prime contractor" until the 3rd week of October (when replaced by contractor QSSI, also responsible for the "data hub"), and the attacks on the contractors are misplaced when their management was so impossibly bad.

The linked Washington Post article is not great, but better: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-administration-...

Re: Obama administration to end contract with company behind HealthCare.gov

#5
>>Accenture, which is one of the world’s largest consulting firms, has extensive experience with computer systems on the state level, and it built California’s new health insurance exchange.

Hasn't California's exchange had big problems too?

Re: Obama administration to end contract with company behind HealthCare.gov

#6
post #4

Is anyone surprised by this?

I wouldn't say I'm surprised, but it definitely is not necessarily usual.

Companies usually win contracts of this magnitude because they "have people who know people". Consequently, "CGI Federal" is, or at least was, well connected with the people in government necessary to shovel boondoggles their way. It is what it is.

I guess in this case the poor optics overcame the connections.

Re: Obama administration to end contract with company behind HealthCare.gov

#8
No shit. This whole ordeal has been nothing short of a complete and utter fucking disaster. And how much did the government pay to have this work done [1]? This is procurement at its finest. The government could have easily paid 10% of what they did to a tech start-up who would have done a much better job utilising scalable technologies.

[1] http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/wp/2013/10/...

Re: Obama administration to end contract with company behind HealthCare.gov

#9
What's sad is that it wasn't so long ago we were treated to breathless articles regarding the software that was used as part of the President's re-election campaign, which apparently was well-tested and well-engineered enough to actually do its job when the time came:

http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/11/when-t...

It seems today's politicians are (at least in some cases) familiar with what it takes to build reliable software. Perhaps the problem is that they are only willing to see that it's done when it benefits them directly, but not when their constituents need it.

Re: Obama administration to end contract with company behind HealthCare.gov

#10

What's sad is that it wasn't so long ago we were treated to breathless articles regarding the software that was used as part of the President's re-election campaign, which apparently was well-tested and well-engineered enough to actually do its job when the time came: http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/11/when-t... It seems today's politicians are (at least in some cases) familiar with what it takes t…

The requirements for working with the USGov are restrictive enough that only specific companies are capable of participating in the bidding process. The Democratic party itself and Obama's re-election are, by contrast, private organizations that are not limited by these rules.

Basically, it seems like the government sourcing process has shrunk the pool of potential bidders too small to provide a properly competitive marketplace for software for USGov customers.

Post reply on HN