Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think what google provide has become societal infrastructure, particularly wrt their monopoly position. That someone else would take their place (however badly executed) is evidence of that. We use it for studying, planning journeys, shopping, finding news, converting measures etc etc. In the process it's taken a position of political and economic importance. It makes a difference to us if google suppresses or boos…
This is what I just heard you say: Regulation is needed because people might exercise free expression. Do you have any idea how evil that sounds? If that is the argument, this is my answer: I will take up arms and die fighting to prevent the realization of such a goal. Media ownership limits are justified only because of a resource scarcity. They do not apply to Internet publications, and with search engines, all I h…
Media ownership limits are about market monopolies, not scarcity, newspapers being a prime example.