Live data from Hacker News

Senator presses NSA to reveal whether it spies on members of Congress

theguardian.com

1–10 of 77 posts

Re: Senator presses NSA to reveal whether it spies on members of Congress

#2
I'm not sure why this particular question is relevant. It seems to assume that members of Congress should be better protected in their privacy than the rest of us.

But I submit that the opposite is true: they should be scrutinized to a much greater degree, and (nearly) everything they do in their office should be an open book to us.

Re: Senator presses NSA to reveal whether it spies on members of Congress

#8
Only for training purposes, with recordings promptly destroyed! See from 1995 (!):

http://articles.baltimoresun.com/1995-12-12/news/1995346001_...

FTA:

"We listened to all the calls in and out of Washington," says one former NSA linguist, recalling a class at the Warrenton Training Center, a CIA communications school on a Virginia hilltop. "We'd listen to senators, representatives, government agencies, housewives talking to their lovers."

Re: Senator presses NSA to reveal whether it spies on members of Congress

#9
post #4

"...if the NSA has spied, or is the NSA currently spying, on members of Congress or other American elected officials" It depends on your definitions of "has", "spied", "spying", "currently", "elected" and "members". So the answer is, "No".

I find it very depressing that semantics and definitions of fairly common-sense words are at the center of this particular set of weaseling.
Post reply on HN