11–20 of 93 posts
apology? these are two kids from Stanford who made a fun project and it just so happen to take off. Give them a break, their team of less than 5 people could careless what the public thinks!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Snapchat isn't a "project" anymore. It's a business.
that turned down a $3b sale. staggering that this call was made.
Maybe I don't quite get Snapchat, but color me unimpressed.
its funny how when things go wrong in private companies, how quickly the general public thinks they can weigh in on how someone needs to stay with that entity. Imagine building something and losing your influence over it to the rest of the world.
apology? these are two kids from Stanford who made a fun project and it just so happen to take off. Give them a break, their team of less than 5 people could careless what the public thinks!
What's the big deal? In the age of surveillance, all data is public.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Snapchat isn't a "project" anymore. It's a business.
It's a business that doesn't have any business.
The important aspect is that the "project" has millions of dollars in investment and employees. Thus, they are accountable to investors and employees who may care about what the public thinks.
Where does media punditry get off on making absolutist calls for heads to "roll"? I mean, imaging if random non-experts had a journalist fired for every failed-prediction or embarrasingly wrong policy analysis penned in an op-ed? There would be no journalists left !
What's the big deal? In the age of surveillance, all data is public.
Data breaches can have very serious consequences for individuals.