Proof Market: Submit Coq proof, get paid with Bitcoin
proofmarket.org
Proof Market: Submit Coq proof, get paid with Bitcoin
1–10 of 31 posts
Re: Proof Market: Submit Coq proof, get paid with Bitcoin
#2Re: Proof Market: Submit Coq proof, get paid with Bitcoin
#3Re: Proof Market: Submit Coq proof, get paid with Bitcoin
#4How much confidence could the seller (i.e. the person doing the proof) have about the buyers ability to pay before they embark on completing the work?
A much better approach would be the buyer puts up the problem they want a proof for and then pays an escrow service, that way you can have more confidence that payment will be completed.
Re: Proof Market: Submit Coq proof, get paid with Bitcoin
#5What would be really cool is to find a way to "lock" the bitcoins so that only a correct proof in Coq of the given theorem could unlock them. Kind of like holomorphic encryption.
Re: Proof Market: Submit Coq proof, get paid with Bitcoin
#6This is a bit ordinary, since it is fundamentally just an escrow service. What would be really cool is to find a way to "lock" the bitcoins so that only a correct proof in Coq of the given theorem could unlock them. Kind of like holomorphic encryption.
Re: Proof Market: Submit Coq proof, get paid with Bitcoin
#7This is a bit ordinary, since it is fundamentally just an escrow service. What would be really cool is to find a way to "lock" the bitcoins so that only a correct proof in Coq of the given theorem could unlock them. Kind of like holomorphic encryption.
Re: Proof Market: Submit Coq proof, get paid with Bitcoin
#8With a signing method, you can simultaneously prove someone created information containing a solution to a problem and the fact someone else paid them for the information.
Re: Proof Market: Submit Coq proof, get paid with Bitcoin
#9This sort of 'market' could surely be used for many other use-cases.
As part of my PhD work, I created a service for crowdsourcing the verification of Java programs which relied on the same characteristic: http://homes.cs.washington.edu/~mernst/pubs/veriweb-oopsla20....
One limitation of these crowd-sourcing approaches is that, in practice, validation ("are we trying to build/prove the right thing?") is as important, if not more important, than verification.
[1] this might not be quite true yet, since a solution of "admitted." would pass the Coq checker.
Re: Proof Market: Submit Coq proof, get paid with Bitcoin
#10This sort of 'market' could surely be used for many other use-cases.
It actually can't -- a fundamental characteristic of this marketplace is that the work can be automatically verified [1]. As part of my PhD work, I created a service for crowdsourcing the verification of Java programs which relied on the same characteristic: http://homes.cs.washington.edu/~mernst/pubs/veriweb-oopsla20... . One limitation of these crowd-sourcing approaches is that, in practice, validation ("are we try…