Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

DigitalOcean - Transparency Regarding Data Security

digitalocean.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–17 of 17 posts

Re: DigitalOcean - Transparency Regarding Data Security

#11

Post by diminoten »

rgbrenner wrote: post #9
diminoten wrote: post #5

I've seen the TRIM recommendation pop up a few times, and never with a reply from DO - is this probably how they're going to handle this, or is there a possible reason for not using TRIM?

TRIM is equivalent to 'mark as free'. there's no guarantee it will zero the data, and whether it is zero'd depends on the manufacturer/model of the drive. If that's how they implement it, then I look forward to reading their future security advisory.

Ah yes, I'm not super familiar with the terminology, a sibling comment to yours specifies that you'd need to use zdat (zero after TRIM) for what I'm talking about to be effective.

Re: DigitalOcean - Transparency Regarding Data Security

#12

Post by diminoten »

rgbrenner wrote: post #10
diminoten wrote: post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A lot of the talk was theoretical and the examples run were I think all within a user's own space. If not though, then you're absolutely right that those are contradictory. If, even during disclosure, one user's data was made available to another user, that constitutes a data leak.

https://github.com/fog/fog/issues/2525 https://f.cloud.github.com/assets/408977/1820859/8658298e-71... These are some of the strings I pulled off the root blockdev - I have no such /var/deploy/chegou, or any of these files. I was able to recover someone else's webserver logs from yesterday, as well.

Yep, in that case that's absolutely a leak of user data.

The blog post is factually incorrect on that point, what a shame.

Re: DigitalOcean - Transparency Regarding Data Security

#13

Post by horseapples »

diminoten wrote: post #12
rgbrenner wrote: post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://github.com/fog/fog/issues/2525 https://f.cloud.github.com/assets/408977/1820859/8658298e-71... These are some of the strings I pulled off the root blockdev - I have no such /var/deploy/chegou, or any of these files. I was able to recover someone else's webserver logs from yesterday, as well.

Yep, in that case that's absolutely a leak of user data. The blog post is factually incorrect on that point, what a shame.

Right now, as far as I can tell, that's speculative on both sides. Simply not enough evidence to say without corroboration that it's factually incorrect.

Re: DigitalOcean - Transparency Regarding Data Security

#14

Post by eridius »

* Our first and immediate update is to ensure that a clean system is provided during creates, regardless of what method was taken for initiating a destroy [...] The scrub feature will remain, allowing customers to take an extra level of precaution if they choose to scrub the data after the delete.

What is a "clean system", if not a scrubbed one? And if they're scrubbing during create, why leave the scrub option in during destroy? I have to assume that when they say "clean system" they don't mean a scrubbed one, and that worries me.

If, as they said, their reason for not scrubbing is because of customers creating and destroying a lot of volumes during the onboarding process, then it seems to me the best solution is one that I believe was suggested in the previous thread. Namely, scrub a volume always whenever it's being used by a new customer. But if the volume is being reused by the same customer, don't bother scrubbing (unless requested), as presumably there are no concerns about leaking information from a user back to the same user.

Re: DigitalOcean - Transparency Regarding Data Security

#16

Post by warp »

aioprisan wrote: post #4

And they forgot to add a date on their security updates. How are you supposed to know when issues are discovered and subsequently addressed?

The linked blog post says "Posted on December 30th, 2013", were you referring to the blog post or something else?
Post reply on HN