Live data from Hacker News

How to be a hacker

theguardian.com

11–20 of 47 posts

Re: How to be a hacker

#11
post #9
post #8

You're not a hacker until a hacker calls you a hacker. ( http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html#hacker_alread... )

Then who was the first hacker?

Doesn't matter. If there is no hacker you can call yourself a hacker without any other hacker complaining :D

Re: How to be a hacker

#12
I thought this was going to be about bash, vi, SICP, cryptanalysis, emacs, asm, or maybe something about 3d printers, or fpgas, or soldering fine point smd ICs onto home stenciled PCBs.

This isn't about being a hacker at all. It's about doing some entry level penetration testing with a software suite designed for that purpose.

Re: How to be a hacker

#15
post #2

Yes, using nmap, metasploit and meterpreter totally makes you a hacker.

OP mentioned Burpsuite. You're just being unnecessarily deflationist and reductionist. You're missing the article for its words (missing the forest for its trees).

Please enlighten me as to the point of this article then, because from my POV, it's a list of 'hacking tools' that you can use to be an entry-level 'hacker'.

This notion of being a hacker due to using a tool is preposterous. The only thing the article does is perpetuate the flawed understanding of computer security and hacking for the general public.

Re: How to be a hacker

#16
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

OP mentioned Burpsuite. You're just being unnecessarily deflationist and reductionist. You're missing the article for its words (missing the forest for its trees).

Please enlighten me as to the point of this article then, because from my POV, it's a list of 'hacking tools' that you can use to be an entry-level 'hacker'. This notion of being a hacker due to using a tool is preposterous. The only thing the article does is perpetuate the flawed understanding of computer security and hacking for the general public.

"We started with Linux" (that's a subheading, mind you!) — "That’s crucial for hackers, because although the temptation is to focus on their tools, the job is as much art as science" — "If you can get physical access to a network"...

Like, you're just not reading the article. You're just not. The fact that the OP mentions "getting physical" is an obvious counterexample to your criticism and reduction of "it's a list of "hacking tools"'. Can you see the narrative (the forest)?

No one calls Linux "a tool" in the sense you're talking about. The OP is saying, with that subheading, "If you're just some Windows [power?] user, you've got to radically change that" — or even further, "If you don't know that OS X is *nix, to say the least, you've got to radically change that".

I mean, it's The Guardian for Chrissake. What do you expect, a list of dotfiles with rich comments?

Post reply on HN