11–20 of 41 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, TCP is a very simple protocol so I can't imagine what the OP means by "all of TCP" unless he's talking about IP and it's associated services.
Because TCP is very simple, you can't imagine that "all of TCP" means what it actually says? Huh?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because TCP is very simple, you can't imagine that "all of TCP" means what it actually says? Huh?
You guys are just to smart for me, I guess I'll have to withdraw from having any conversation at all since I've been downvoted into hellban for asking a question.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because TCP is very simple, you can't imagine that "all of TCP" means what it actually says? Huh?
You guys are just to smart for me, I guess I'll have to withdraw from having any conversation at all since I've been downvoted into hellban for asking a question.
I would suggest that you would benefit from learning how to ask questions. Here's a start:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
However, there's more advice than that, and that, although a good start, is not to be taken as gospel. You probably also should read the site-specific commentary, and suggested alternatives:
https://mikeash.com/getting_answers.html
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2911381
The point is this - you said:
Well, TCP is a very simple protocol so I can't imagine
what the OP means by "all of TCP" unless he's talking
about IP and it's associated services.
I'm not sure I understand what's been left out of this.
Could someone provide a synopsis, and a pointer to more
details?
And just as a final question - why do you think you've been hell-banned? Are you sure? In particular, I've turned on "Show dead", and you don't seem to have made any comments that have been auto-killed. The evidence suggests you are not hell-banned.
This is a very famous post, and Van Jacobsen is the archetypical networking systems programming bad-ass. Important context here though: this is just the per-segment receive processing piece of TCP; it's describing a very simple fast path that segments can take, but not all the TCP logic!
Wouldn't "all the TCP logic" be the entire internet?
This is a very famous post, and Van Jacobsen is the archetypical networking systems programming bad-ass. Important context here though: this is just the per-segment receive processing piece of TCP; it's describing a very simple fast path that segments can take, but not all the TCP logic!
Wouldn't "all the TCP logic" be the entire internet?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because TCP is very simple, you can't imagine that "all of TCP" means what it actually says? Huh?
You guys are just to smart for me, I guess I'll have to withdraw from having any conversation at all since I've been downvoted into hellban for asking a question.
I love the opinionated writing style. I wish I knew more about this so I could relate to the comments about the "compiler braindamage", "mbuf chain stupidity", and "netipl software interrupt bs".
This is a very famous post, and Van Jacobsen is the archetypical networking systems programming bad-ass. Important context here though: this is just the per-segment receive processing piece of TCP; it's describing a very simple fast path that segments can take, but not all the TCP logic!
Wouldn't "all the TCP logic" be the entire internet?