Of all groups you'd hope to be able to detect and protect their staff against radiation, wouldn't the US Navy be fairly near the top of the list? Much as TEPCO may be at fault over the actual reactor the sailors being exposed unnecessarily sounds more like Naval negligence.
Navy sailors have radiation sickness after Japan rescue
11–20 of 161 posts
Re: Navy sailors have radiation sickness after Japan rescue
#12Re: Navy sailors have radiation sickness after Japan rescue
#13Re: Navy sailors have radiation sickness after Japan rescue
#14How statistically significant is 70 people out of 5,680 suffering serious health problems over 2.5 years? I'm guessing that most people on board were fairly young and in good health.
Re: Navy sailors have radiation sickness after Japan rescue
#15Re: Navy sailors have radiation sickness after Japan rescue
#16A failed multimillion-dollar radiation-detection system. Why didn't they have this activated? "The toxic seawater was sucked into the ship’s desalinization system, flowing out of its faucets and showers — still radioactive — and into the crew member’s bodies."
Re: Navy sailors have radiation sickness after Japan rescue
#17I think it was a really cool hack and one of my favorites, but it didn't go anywhere with the jury (I guess no business model and all :) ).
http://techcrunch.com/2013/10/26/open-radioactivity-warning-...
http://techcrunch.com/video/open-radioactivity-warning-syste... (Video)
Re: Navy sailors have radiation sickness after Japan rescue
#18Wikipedia says the USS Ronald Regan has a total crew of 5,680. How statistically significant is 70 people out of 5,680 suffering serious health problems over 2.5 years? I'm guessing that most people on board were fairly young and in good health.
Imagine waking up every day for the rest of your life and wondering if you have cancer today? Not good..
Edit: and let's not talk about the increased likelihood of disfigured offspring.