Live data from Hacker News

Telegram protocol defeated. Authors are going to modify crypto-algorithm

translate.google.com

71–80 of 223 posts

Re: Telegram protocol defeated. Authors are going to modify crypto-algorithm

#71

I'm excited by the insight and modesty of this guy. I will see to it that he gets a mighty prize. It's great to see how open software can leverage the power of the community to find weak spots and become stronger.

He has essentially defeated your protocol, so he deserves the full $200,000. After Lavabit, it is no longer a fair assumption that you (or government agencies forcing your hand) will not interfere with the protocol to compromise it.

Re: Telegram protocol defeated. Authors are going to modify crypto-algorithm

#72
Why is Telegram in the HNews so much? Are they part of the YC fraternity? Why do pay so much attention to crypto hucksters?

It hasn't been so long since the last snake oil peddlers had their roasting -- I forget the name, it was some cutesy web-browser "secure" chat thing.

It's cool to report debunkings, but if it weren't for HN, I (and most others?) never would have even seen these products in the first place.

Re: Telegram protocol defeated. Authors are going to modify crypto-algorithm

#73
post #63
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would you post such an inane one-liner like that? Jimmytucson made a very good point, which is that the very intelligent Telegram authors tried really hard to make a solid product, made a huge gamble that didn't quite pay off like they wanted, and that all we see now are the smug, told-you-so vultures swooping in to pat themselves on the back for being oh so much smarter than the stupid crypto guys.

No one cares that you tried really hard before failing, doubly so with security products.

[deleted]

Re: Telegram protocol defeated. Authors are going to modify crypto-algorithm

#74
post #73
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No one cares that you tried really hard before failing, doubly so with security products.

[deleted]

Really?! So, as a teacher, if you gave me feedback and I repeated "No" smugly, over and over and over, and insisted that I was right and you were wrong... you're not going to at least have a twinge of "told you so"?

We got Gandi over here posting on HN.

Re: Telegram protocol defeated. Authors are going to modify crypto-algorithm

#75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

RIP Telegram (2013-2013). omg made me lol super hard

I see you've only been here for 33 days so I'll lend you a hand. This is HN, and we don't make posts like that.

Counterexamples:

1) Every Bitcoin thread

2) Every NSA/Snowden thread

Source (cough): I've been around for 6.3 years, am in the top 40 users in terms of net karma, and am actually very frustrated with the unfortunate turn the community has taken in the past 12-18 months. And am considering leaving, which makes me sad.

Re: Telegram protocol defeated. Authors are going to modify crypto-algorithm

#76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I see you've only been here for 33 days so I'll lend you a hand. This is HN, and we don't make posts like that.

Counterexamples: 1) Every Bitcoin thread 2) Every NSA/Snowden thread Source (cough): I've been around for 6.3 years, am in the top 40 users in terms of net karma, and am actually very frustrated with the unfortunate turn the community has taken in the past 12-18 months. And am considering leaving, which makes me sad.

Not sure what either of those two topics has to do with this thread..

Re: Telegram protocol defeated. Authors are going to modify crypto-algorithm

#77
post #34

There's a lesson here. I genuinely don't mean to sound smug, but -- remember how confident the Telegram guys were? Remember how sure they were that their protocol would be able to resist the eavesdropping efforts of the NSA and whatever other nefarious interlopers may come along? Remember how they said they'd been working on it for years, and presumably expected for it to last many more years? Remember how that was,…

Did you write the encryption algorithm? Did you have the balls to put 200 grand on the table for anyone who could break it? Did you rise to the challenge and claim the cash? No, you just stood on the sideline and waited for somebody to fail so you could come down off your branch and peck at the corpse. Indeed, there is a lesson here. Don't expect anybody to pat you on the back when you put it all on black and win. Be…

[deleted]

Re: Telegram protocol defeated. Authors are going to modify crypto-algorithm

#78
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Counterexamples: 1) Every Bitcoin thread 2) Every NSA/Snowden thread Source (cough): I've been around for 6.3 years, am in the top 40 users in terms of net karma, and am actually very frustrated with the unfortunate turn the community has taken in the past 12-18 months. And am considering leaving, which makes me sad.

Not sure what either of those two topics has to do with this thread..

Absolutely nothing, so downvote away. I'm just expressing my overall frustration with this board.

Re: Telegram protocol defeated. Authors are going to modify crypto-algorithm

#79
post #61
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you suffering from testosterone poisoning or something?

Why would you post such an inane one-liner like that? Jimmytucson made a very good point, which is that the very intelligent Telegram authors tried really hard to make a solid product, made a huge gamble that didn't quite pay off like they wanted, and that all we see now are the smug, told-you-so vultures swooping in to pat themselves on the back for being oh so much smarter than the stupid crypto guys.

The reason for these comments is because you're exactly right– they are gambling. Putting $200k on the line in the hopes of winning mindshare, reputation, etc. Of course if you lose, you'll lose all of that and your money. I'm really happy that more people are getting into crypto and not browbeating themselves out of creating new stuff because it's necessary for any field to grow. These negative responses are also necessary so that those people stop trying to raise their own victory flags prematurely, making it even harder for outsiders to be appreciated for their work.

Note: This is not so much in response to thom's comment, but rather the criticism of jimmytucson's comment (which actually has some substance).

Re: Telegram protocol defeated. Authors are going to modify crypto-algorithm

#80

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I see you've only been here for 33 days so I'll lend you a hand. This is HN, and we don't make posts like that.

Counterexamples: 1) Every Bitcoin thread 2) Every NSA/Snowden thread Source (cough): I've been around for 6.3 years, am in the top 40 users in terms of net karma, and am actually very frustrated with the unfortunate turn the community has taken in the past 12-18 months. And am considering leaving, which makes me sad.

Maybe they need to turn down the account-ghosting requirements a few notches?
Post reply on HN