Live data from Hacker News

Coinbase Crosses 650,000 Users

blog.coinbase.com

11–20 of 122 posts

Re: Coinbase Crosses 650,000 Users

#11
post #4
post #2

Congrats to them, but could a graph be more disingenuous than the one used there that shows Bitcoin prices?

At least it's labeled that the BTC-USD price is the daily average for the month.

Explains the timing of the blog post, the graph would look very different next month.

Re: Coinbase Crosses 650,000 Users

#12
Could someone visit coinbase's career page and confirm that the Apply buttons are not working. https://coinbase.com/careers

Coinbase has one of the more interesting legal positions I have come across in a long time (registration/licensing/compliance work) and I know I will be kicking myself a year from now if I did not make every effort.

Re: Coinbase Crosses 650,000 Users

#13
post #3

So the piece about more women was a little bit weird. It appears that as the broader market (made up of ~50% women) begins to use your product, you experience your demographic skew towards the broader markets' average demographic. Breathtaking.

I think they are trying to illustrate a move towards more mass-market appeal and reach. Depending on which data source you look at, females account for anywhere from 70 to 90+% of consumer purchase decisions in the US. If Coinbase wants to move from being the cryptocurrency enthusiast and tech speculator's toy to actually seeing significant product/service spend in Bitcoins with merchants, increasing their female userbase could definitely help.

Re: Coinbase Crosses 650,000 Users

#14
post #6

Note the title is a bit misleading. They say 650,000 users but the next sentence they state > "we crossed more than 650,000 consumer Bitcoin wallets" I'm not familiar with their service but I have 20 or so wallets that I've accumulated over the past 20 months, so I'm guessing its entirely possible for a single user to have multiple wallets, infact its so common that I'd label it the norm. I wonder what percentage of…

You have 20 Coinbase wallets? Unlike regular bitcoin wallets, there's no reason to have more than one Coinbase wallet. A Coinbase wallet can have an unlimited number of Bitcoin addresses and it is generally tied to a real name with a bank account and/or credit card for purchasing and selling bitcoins.

What is the point of having multiples of any wallet? Which wallet would be less effective on its own? Don't they all produce a sufficient (indefinite?) number of pseudorandom addresses?

Re: Coinbase Crosses 650,000 Users

#15

Could someone visit coinbase's career page and confirm that the Apply buttons are not working. https://coinbase.com/careers Coinbase has one of the more interesting legal positions I have come across in a long time (registration/licensing/compliance work) and I know I will be kicking myself a year from now if I did not make every effort.

They work, but they are "mailto:" links.

Re: Coinbase Crosses 650,000 Users

#16
post #8
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You have 20 Coinbase wallets? Unlike regular bitcoin wallets, there's no reason to have more than one Coinbase wallet. A Coinbase wallet can have an unlimited number of Bitcoin addresses and it is generally tied to a real name with a bank account and/or credit card for purchasing and selling bitcoins.

Probably to avoid people associating ownership to one person as easily?

Coinbase use things like font fingerprinting to identify their users. Having multiple accounts is useless.

Re: Coinbase Crosses 650,000 Users

#17

Note the title is a bit misleading. They say 650,000 users but the next sentence they state > "we crossed more than 650,000 consumer Bitcoin wallets" I'm not familiar with their service but I have 20 or so wallets that I've accumulated over the past 20 months, so I'm guessing its entirely possible for a single user to have multiple wallets, infact its so common that I'd label it the norm. I wonder what percentage of…

You probably mean you have 1 wallet, containing 20 Bitcoin addresses.

Not sure why Coinbase uses the terminology "consumer Bitcoin wallet", but it is pretty clear they mean "user accounts", where each account is associated to 1 wallet, each containing possibly multiple addresses.

Re: Coinbase Crosses 650,000 Users

#18
Speaking as someone who knows a lot about economics, I think PT Barnum put it best...[1]

Economics is very clear in predicting how this will end up. Bitcoins have no intrinsic value and therefore the long-term price will be precisely zero. Each generation has its tulips [2]; each generation claims that the persistence in tulip price means that there is permanent intrinsic value; each generation is disappointed [3].

The only thing interesting about bitcoins is that this provides an opportunity to watch a bubble: observe the justifications people make, observe how nay-sayers appear to be wrong, and watch the progression.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There%27s_a_sucker_born_every_m...

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_mania

[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraordinary_Popular_Delusions...

Re: Coinbase Crosses 650,000 Users

#19
post #18

Speaking as someone who knows a lot about economics, I think PT Barnum put it best...[1] Economics is very clear in predicting how this will end up. Bitcoins have no intrinsic value and therefore the long-term price will be precisely zero. Each generation has its tulips [2]; each generation claims that the persistence in tulip price means that there is permanent intrinsic value; each generation is disappointed [3]. T…

> Bitcoins have no intrinsic value

Neither does gold, paper money, or diamonds. And yet they've remained valuable for a long time. What gives?

Re: Coinbase Crosses 650,000 Users

#20
post #18

Speaking as someone who knows a lot about economics, I think PT Barnum put it best...[1] Economics is very clear in predicting how this will end up. Bitcoins have no intrinsic value and therefore the long-term price will be precisely zero. Each generation has its tulips [2]; each generation claims that the persistence in tulip price means that there is permanent intrinsic value; each generation is disappointed [3]. T…

They were initially valued as collectibles (just like gold) and then as a speculative investment. Now that a market exists and there is liquidity, they are valued for other reasons as well (payment system, black market transactions, hide wealth ... etc). Explain how we get to 0 from here since they will always have an underlying value as a collectible and speculative investment?
Post reply on HN