Live data from Hacker News

New US spy satellite logo features world-devouring octopus

arstechnica.com

41–50 of 129 posts

Re: New US spy satellite logo features world-devouring octopus

#41
post #3

Link-baity title, but warranted, I'd say. The story is that the government is launching a spy satellite with a logo on it featuring a "mascot" -- a giant Kraken-like octopus taking over the planet. Whoever created it could only have been thinking of their bureau's unchecked ability to do what it wanted and not the public's perception of it because the creature, especially its eye, looks menacing, ominous, foreboding,…

[deleted]

Re: New US spy satellite logo features world-devouring octopus

#42
This is like the Rapiscan. Really, you are going to name an invasive x-ray-taking-pictures-of-your-junk device Rapi-scan?

It is slapping you in the face and laughing at it just because they can. Someone said "Hey I bet I can do this and get away with it. Here hold mah beer, watch me draw a giant octupus devouring the earth!"

Re: New US spy satellite logo features world-devouring octopus

#43

That Octopus is probably one of their tamer patches. The National Reconnaissance Office missions have the best patches - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NRO_Launches and http://www.thelivingmoon.com/45jack_files/03files/Mission_Pa... detail them rather well.

There's a whole book, titled I Could Tell You But Then You Would Have to be Destroyed by Me: Emblems from the Pentagon's Black World: http://www.amazon.com/Could-Tell-Then-Would-Destroyed/dp/193...

Re: New US spy satellite logo features world-devouring octopus

#44
post #3

Link-baity title, but warranted, I'd say. The story is that the government is launching a spy satellite with a logo on it featuring a "mascot" -- a giant Kraken-like octopus taking over the planet. Whoever created it could only have been thinking of their bureau's unchecked ability to do what it wanted and not the public's perception of it because the creature, especially its eye, looks menacing, ominous, foreboding,…

>especially its eye, looks menacing, ominous, foreboding, malicious, malevolent, and borderline evil. It implies the agency is insular, unaccountable, and has an aggressive, secret agenda

Thanks, that gave me a good chuckle. I never realized the power of a cartoon eye.

Re: New US spy satellite logo features world-devouring octopus

#45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or the mindset of a spy sattelite. I honestly don't get what the fuss is all about. They wouldn't launch a spy sattellite with the tagline 'We can only see a very small bit of earth after getting a court to agree on it in triplets', would they?

The only way one cannot understand "what the fuss is all about" is by ignoring the context under which all of this is happening.

Or, by being rational and reasonable.

Re: New US spy satellite logo features world-devouring octopus

#47
post #40

That Octopus is probably one of their tamer patches. The National Reconnaissance Office missions have the best patches - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NRO_Launches and http://www.thelivingmoon.com/45jack_files/03files/Mission_Pa... detail them rather well.

If you are a fan of "Sneakers", you'll find this one familiar: http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2012/09/sneake...

Setec Astronomy! God that brings back memories.

Re: New US spy satellite logo features world-devouring octopus

#50
post #20
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Historically, this doesn't end well. Doesn't end well for us the little people. Those who operate in the shadows, those have the power to play these games probably have it a lot better since they undoubtedly operate outside the rules they set for the rest of us (witness the lack of accountability shown by anyone who has ever been involved in any of these shenanigans).

You think? http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/1991-08-31/news/9102020946_... In this kind of system, nobody is safe, and nobody wins.

It took decades before the tide turned, and it did because of external forces or it would have continued for a lot longer.

There is no reason to think that today's system would end up the same way without some huge counter-balancing force that I'm afraid I do not see in today's world order.

Post reply on HN