While I think more people should learn code, I think the president getting up and telling everyone to do anything that isn't applicable to... well... every-freaking-one ... is stupid. Washington is clueless in two ways. (1) It normally doesn't get new things and lags behind. (2) When it does get things, it proceeds to fail at execution or not really get them and do ham-fisted things like this. So that means that Wash…
President Obama calls on every American to learn code
11–20 of 441 posts
Re: President Obama calls on every American to learn code
#12Re: President Obama calls on every American to learn code
#13Re: President Obama calls on every American to learn code
#14Wow. Looks like Youtube comments haven't improved much after all. Seriously, it seems like half of the comments seen on Youtube (or at the bottom of any article on a news site) read as if they could have come right from a post on StormFront.
Re: President Obama calls on every American to learn code
#15including an activity for people with no programming experience: http://learn.code.org/hoc/1
Re: President Obama calls on every American to learn code
#16Re: President Obama calls on every American to learn code
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed. No matter how effective you think he is, or how much you like his policies, it seems pretty clear he's under tremendous stress.
Working with the congress that has the lowest approval rating in history, and the congress that has passed the least amount of bills will do that to you.
Re: President Obama calls on every American to learn code
#18Why not focus on the more critical skills in life that are more applicable to most people. Here's a big one:
1. Learn to communicate. Improve your writing and speaking skills.
Re: President Obama calls on every American to learn code
#19Buzzer #1. It doesn't take just "a little bit" of math. It takes a TON of math. Reading CLRS took me a month to master, and that was already with a background in elementary calculus using the infinitesimal approach. I'm reading Knuth's seminal "Art of," and I can immediately say that it would be absolute hell for anyone without an advanced mathematics background.
That brings us to mistruth #2: that somehow, learning to "code" will help younger people build tomorrow. That's utter bull. Learning to code will only lead to worse code: uglier, crappier, and less elegant and efficient code. Github will become a junk pile. Instead of coding, we need to teach students the programming part of computer science. Get a copy of Algorithms into every CS course and get rid of all of the silicon in the classroom. Trust me, people will learn much more meaningful things about problem-solving that way. Isn't that what writing code really sets out to do? You know, SOLVE PROBLEMS? Just code is NOT going to help that at ALL.
Then there's problem number 3, and probably the largest one: it assumes that programming is something we need EVERYONE to learn. EVERYONE. Yes, that is Code.org's goal. EVERYONE SHOULD CODE.
You know what, fuck it and let's teach EVERYONE TO BE A MECHANIC. Right? Why the hell not? It's like programming. Only that nobody in their right minds would tell people to make mechanical engineering a part of the curriculum. But people insist on doing the same for CS, as if it's any different.
I could go on about this for days. But forget it, Atwood's explained it far better than I ever could.
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
originally posted in the original discussion located here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6873136