I correctly called the peak at 1200 (although I did not think it would peak there twice), and I'm calling the bottom at 300. This article has a very poor opening: Bitcoin is based on the idea that money gets its intrinsic value from its scarcity, which is a misconception since money gets its intrinsic value from the volume of transactions involving goods and services that use it No, bitcoin is based on the idea that…
Are you predicting it will bottom at 300 before launching into another growth phase, or that it will remain closer to 300 thereafter? I think the latter is naive. I think bitcoin is the first currency whose perpetual deflation is ensured by the contract that defines it.
While I think that bitcoin will recover, perpetual deflation is not guaranteed. Indeed, in general deflation of bitcoin depends on an increase in demand that outstrips the increase in supply.