Earlier quoted context omitted.
How so? The quick software updates is a selling point to devs but not so much to consumers. We aren't their target market. It seems like a good place to cut costs since you don't have the huge reaccuring engineering costs and there is much more freedom on part selection
Anecdotal point, but my Mom is much happier to get an update with a new phone than to have an old phone updated.
Google’s $179 Moto G puts every single cheap Android phone to shame
21–30 of 265 posts
Re: Google’s $179 Moto G puts every single cheap Android phone to shame
#22Re: Google’s $179 Moto G puts every single cheap Android phone to shame
#23I can't wait for a Verizon version (apparently 1Q 2014) to pare up with PagePlus, so I can dump my VZ contract and only pay half of what I do now.
I bought 3 moto g's and on the day they arrived switched the entire family to tmobile. I had enough of Verizon and now my bill is $100 a month. Can't beat that.
Re: Google’s $179 Moto G puts every single cheap Android phone to shame
#24Re: Google’s $179 Moto G puts every single cheap Android phone to shame
#25Right move to target market in India and China , its way affordable than Iphone 5C and comes with the brand name too.
Re: Google’s $179 Moto G puts every single cheap Android phone to shame
#26Re: Google’s $179 Moto G puts every single cheap Android phone to shame
#27$179 is way too much for a phone that sends all of your login information for different pages and services to Motorola's servers in plaintext...
What are you talking about?
Re: Google’s $179 Moto G puts every single cheap Android phone to shame
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
What are you talking about?
Just the regular "NSA/Google is evil/wake up people" troll. Ignore and carry on.
Re: Google’s $179 Moto G puts every single cheap Android phone to shame
#29Re: Google’s $179 Moto G puts every single cheap Android phone to shame
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
macs are also a premium price compared to PC's....not sure how comparably this is
And the Mac market share compared to PC market share shows which is far more dominant.