Live data from Hacker News

How inmate Michael Morton lost 25 years of his life

cnn.com

21–30 of 85 posts

Re: How inmate Michael Morton lost 25 years of his life

#21
"It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer"

That was said in 1765, I think we are regressing. Power hungry police and prosecutors are getting worse. They only care about making arrests and getting convictions, innocence doesn't matter. I am surprised that the prosecutor was actually charged and then convicted.

Re: How inmate Michael Morton lost 25 years of his life

#22
Slightly (only slightly) off-topic: what is it going to take for us to see a complete or at least large overhaul of the justice system in the US? We're incarcerating too many people for minor crimes and it is causing a ripple effect on poverty and economic growth (not to mention ruining TONS of people's lives).

Re: How inmate Michael Morton lost 25 years of his life

#23
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I bet there were people who campaigned for the innocent man to be executed based on exactly this state of mind.

I don't see the equivalency. The prosecutor abused his official position and the legal system to personally advance his career. If anything, we should hold our officials and authorities to even harsher standards to ensure equitable treatment under the law.

My point as the GP entirely.

You can only hold a prosecutor to a "perfect standard" if they have the power to ruin a person's life through self-interest. That perfect standard should only be enforced the other way as well in the circumstance that they do something wrong on this scale.

These positions attract people who wish to be wealthy or powerful. This might not be the case if they have to live up to their own standards.

Examples should be made of both sides.

Re: How inmate Michael Morton lost 25 years of his life

#24

Slightly (only slightly) off-topic: what is it going to take for us to see a complete or at least large overhaul of the justice system in the US? We're incarcerating too many people for minor crimes and it is causing a ripple effect on poverty and economic growth (not to mention ruining TONS of people's lives).

And not to mention enriching some people through wrong means.

Re: How inmate Michael Morton lost 25 years of his life

#25

Slightly (only slightly) off-topic: what is it going to take for us to see a complete or at least large overhaul of the justice system in the US? We're incarcerating too many people for minor crimes and it is causing a ripple effect on poverty and economic growth (not to mention ruining TONS of people's lives).

Can you be more specific? What minor crimes are you talking about? What's the breakdown of crimes for the the current prison population? Have any references to articles that have a deeper discussion so we can come up to speed?

Re: How inmate Michael Morton lost 25 years of his life

#26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't see the equivalency. The prosecutor abused his official position and the legal system to personally advance his career. If anything, we should hold our officials and authorities to even harsher standards to ensure equitable treatment under the law.

If anything, we should fix the systems that allow miscarriages of justice like this to happen. Yet revenge seems to be the first motivation of most people. Making things worse instead of making things better.

It's not about revenge.

Our motivation to not do things is driven by consequences.

When the balance of power exists so that those who determine consequences for people can do so out of self-interest, they need to be held up to the same standards and face equal consequences themselves.

The prosecutor should have a sentence passed against him to ensure others do not follow suit with "$500 and 500 hours community service, oh and I can still be a legal consultant for a corporation - I can accept that risk for some gain"...

Re: How inmate Michael Morton lost 25 years of his life

#27
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I bet there were people who campaigned for the innocent man to be executed based on exactly this state of mind.

I don't see the equivalency. The prosecutor abused his official position and the legal system to personally advance his career. If anything, we should hold our officials and authorities to even harsher standards to ensure equitable treatment under the law.

You are certain, after reading some newspaper articles, that Ken Anderson abused his position for personal gain, and the most important thing to you is that he be punished more severely. Your slogan: "an eye for an eye".

Other people were certain, after reading some newspaper articles, that Michael Morton murdered his wife because she would not submit to him sexually, and the most important thing to them was that he be punished more severely. Their slogan: "an eye for an eye".

See the similarity now?

Re: How inmate Michael Morton lost 25 years of his life

#28
very sad story. I still can't believe the prosecuter only served 5 days in jail and paid a minor fine. These injustices are crushing my heart. I do really want to believe in fairness and Justice but after reading such a piece I cannot maintain those illusions.

What can we do as individuals and as a society to improve the Justice system and help rehabilitate former criminals? This is an area where we should also have start-ups looking to make a better tomorrow. Isn't that also part of "Changing The World"?

Re: How inmate Michael Morton lost 25 years of his life

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If anything, we should fix the systems that allow miscarriages of justice like this to happen. Yet revenge seems to be the first motivation of most people. Making things worse instead of making things better.

We should, but part of fixing the system that allows these things to happen is penalizing "bad actors." The prosecutor hid evidence from the judge, not just the defense. In addition, a brutal murderer is still free among the populace. What if they've killed again in the interim?

In this case the prosecutor's witheld evidence did result in another murder by the real perpetraitor 2 years later so your point is especially valid.

The prosecutor should have that on his shoulders as well.

Post reply on HN