But do they have to limit fuel. Does the advantage of the turbo outweigh more pitstops? I'm afraid races might get boring when drivers will have to conserve their fuel or just lose the race.
Cars going round in circles? I already find that fairly boring.
F1 2014: All aboard the 'power train' - new rules explained
21–30 of 197 posts
Re: F1 2014: All aboard the 'power train' - new rules explained
#22There are so many rules dictating the design of an F1 chassis/engine that I wonder how much faster a "anything goes" car would go.
> There are so many rules dictating the design of an F1 chassis/engine that I wonder how much faster a "anything goes" car would go. The cars could be made so fast that humans could not drive the cars any more. In addition, safety of the audience would be compromised and the costs would be prohibitively expensive to maintain competition. While there has been a set of rules and regulations always in Formula 1 (that's…
Re: F1 2014: All aboard the 'power train' - new rules explained
#23How do they handle network latency back to simulation / data processing environments when travelling?
In short, the latency introduced by voice comms far outweighs any geographical distance introduced by sending data to and from the cray at homebase.
Re: F1 2014: All aboard the 'power train' - new rules explained
#24How do they handle network latency back to simulation / data processing environments when travelling?
They use data links (at some point they used direct radio links, don't know what happens these days) back and forth from the car to the pit wall and all the way back to the factory. There's around 20-50 engineers working every time the cars are out on track.
But the telemetry is all one way, it's not allowed to control the car from the pit wall. There are computer programs and engineers analyzing the telemetry all the time but all they can do is give instructions to the driver.
You can regularly see/hear this happen in races. There may be a slight collision between cars and e.g. the front wing gets damaged a little. The driver will radio the pit wall and ask whether they have damage or not. The engineers behind the pits and in the factory will analyze the data from the suspension travel vs. pitot tube telemetry and conclude whether there's damage to the wings and whether that damage is grave enough to warrant changing the front wing at the pits (~10 seconds stationary).
Here's an amazing video from McLaren mission control in their factory in Great Britain while the cars are out on track in Korea on the other side of world. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYhl7csZJHw
Re: F1 2014: All aboard the 'power train' - new rules explained
#25Re: F1 2014: All aboard the 'power train' - new rules explained
#26But do they have to limit fuel. Does the advantage of the turbo outweigh more pitstops? I'm afraid races might get boring when drivers will have to conserve their fuel or just lose the race.
Cars going round in circles? I already find that fairly boring.
Re: F1 2014: All aboard the 'power train' - new rules explained
#27There are so many rules dictating the design of an F1 chassis/engine that I wonder how much faster a "anything goes" car would go.
This video is an interesting comparison of just how fast F1 cars are: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2cNqaPSHv0 IIRC some of those GT cars that look like snails compared to F1 cars are "anything goes". However, here is a truly anything goes car (that has broken the speed barrier on land): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKQ-xj5C2m8 So yeah, an anything goes car will go much faster than an F1 car. But it's going to su…
Re: F1 2014: All aboard the 'power train' - new rules explained
#28There are so many rules dictating the design of an F1 chassis/engine that I wonder how much faster a "anything goes" car would go.
Adrian Newey (most successful F1 designer in the history of the sport) designed the Red Bull X2010 for the game Gran Turismo based on the concept of building the fastest car possible in an 'anything goes' scenario: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Bull_X2010 The limit becomes G-forces that a driver can bear, especially over a race distance. They limited it to 6G. For an engine they interestingly picked a 3L V6, where…
Also here's an interesting comparison betweek the X2010 and X2011: http://xn-games.net/okra/2011/10/29/gran-turismo-5-red-bull-...
Finally, tech specs and diagrams (indicating load & downforce) for the X2010: http://jonsibal.com/blog/2010/10/red-bull-x1/
Re: F1 2014: All aboard the 'power train' - new rules explained
#29The video mentions that the aerodynamics of the car generates so much down-force that it could ride upside-down on the ceiling. Wow.
Re: F1 2014: All aboard the 'power train' - new rules explained
#30There are so many rules dictating the design of an F1 chassis/engine that I wonder how much faster a "anything goes" car would go.
Yeah! I always thought it would be mint to be able to do whatever you wanted, put a saturn V engine in it you wanted. Would make great telly. Ditto the paralympics - there should be a class where they can pimp up their kit to the max.
As to the question whether or not this would make for "great telly" or not, I leave to those far more cynical than me.