Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: I built a live Bitcoin price aggregator with multiple indexes

live.bitcoinindex.es

51–60 of 68 posts

Re: Show HN: I built a live Bitcoin price aggregator with multiple indexes

#52
post #19

Now that I have a huge stash of bit coins I was thinking of making a service/startup where you could lend out your bit coins to people who would agree to pay you back a slightly higher number of coins in the future. Kind of like a bank but not corrupt and full of banksters like the federal reserve and JP Morgan. Once I have traction I can IPO but instead of sell my shares for cash I would sell them in bit coins. I th…

Out of pure curiosity, what's a "huge stash" of bitcoins these days? Top 100 on the bitcoin rich list? Top 1000? http://bitcoinrichlist.com/top100

Instead of lending, what about investing in startups using bitcoins?

Re: Show HN: I built a live Bitcoin price aggregator with multiple indexes

#53
post #19

Now that I have a huge stash of bit coins I was thinking of making a service/startup where you could lend out your bit coins to people who would agree to pay you back a slightly higher number of coins in the future. Kind of like a bank but not corrupt and full of banksters like the federal reserve and JP Morgan. Once I have traction I can IPO but instead of sell my shares for cash I would sell them in bit coins. I th…

This would open up the possibility of shorting Bitcoins. Could get big.

You can already short Bitcoin; it's been possible for several years on Bitfinex and previous platforms (I forget the predecessor's name).

Re: Show HN: I built a live Bitcoin price aggregator with multiple indexes

#54
post #30

So, assume I already have Bitcoins on Coinbase and have a verified account to sell them easily. Theoretically, my plan for free money would look like this: - Say I have 11 BTC on Coinbase. Wire $10k to OKPAY ($25 bank fee, 0% OKPAY commission) Send OKPAY money to BTC-E, $200 fee (2%). - Now I have $9,775 on BTC-E. Within ~1 second of each other, I enter a market order to buy 10.754 BTC on BTC-e for $9,775, and sell 1…

BTC-e is based in an unknown city in Bulgaria and the operators are unknown. Keep that in mind when trading there. This is probably the most important factor for the prices there being so low, they could basically just take your money and run without you having any chance of getting hold of the operators.

Re: Show HN: I built a live Bitcoin price aggregator with multiple indexes

#59
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would anyone want to borrow money in a deflationary currency (Bitcoins) rather than an inflationary one (dollars)?

You want to borrow bit coins so that you can improve your business and then pay back the coins with increased profits due to the improvements. Isn't that obvious? I'm not interested in dollars because I don't think they are particularly useful. I convert all my dollars to bit coins whenever I can. Look at the price of bit coin in dollar terms and you'll see everyone else is doing the same thing. Do you think the API…

Your conversion makes sense (USD -> BTC) so long as both mantain the current trend (BTC increasing in value wrt USD). Why? It's like investing in a stock or commodity that's increasing. I invested extra cash in a few stocks, including TSLA, while it was on the rise. This gave me a better ROI than holding USD or investing it in a CD or other low interest rate account.

But as a borrower, deflation blows. If I borrow 100 BTC and the terms of the loan are that I have to pay back 100 BTC + 10 BTC as interest, but the value of BTC has increased by another 10% I'm really paying 21% interest on the loan.

But as a borrower, inflation rocks. If I borrow 100 USD and the terms of the loan are that I have to pay back 100 USD + 10 USD as interest, but the value of USD has decreased by 10% I'm really paying 0% interest on the loan (actually, I might be able to beat inflation and come out ahead).

This goes back to what I mentioned in another thread [1] about buying and selling in either type of currency.

Let me hand wave some things, we'll assume that the real value of an item or ROI is static, and only the nominal value is changing with inflation or deflation.

Inflation: I borrow money to buy an item. I pay interest on the loan, and gain the benefit of having the item today rather than a year later when I would have saved up the cash. Over that year I pay off the loan, but with inflation I may get a discount of sorts on the item. If inflation is 10%, the nominal value is 10% higher the next year. If the interest payment is less than 10% I've saved money. If it's more than 10%, hopefully there was a profit in having the item now rather than later or I lost money.

Deflation: I borrow money to buy an item. I pay interest on the loan, and gain the benefit of having the item today rather than a year later when I would have saved up the cash. Over that year I pay off the loan, but with deflation I have an added cost. If deflation is 10%, the nominal value is 10% lower the next year. If the interest payment is negative ~10%, I've saved money. If it's higher, then hopefully there was a profit in having the item now rather than later or I lost money.

In fact, that matrix is essentially the same. Borrowers win in inflation (or might), while lenders might lose (but it beats leaving the cash under the mattress where it will lose value). Borrowers lose in deflation in most circumstances, while lenders win as long as borrowers don't default too often. Lenders under deflation have to be confident that the expected ROI of their loans will beat the deflation rate, or they might as well leave the cash alone. Lenders under inflation are virtually guaranteed that reasonable loan practices (subprime mortgages being an example of unreasonable loan practices) will be better than sitting on the cash if the economy is otherwise stable.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6811101

Re: Show HN: I built a live Bitcoin price aggregator with multiple indexes

#60
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why would anyone want to borrow money in a deflationary currency (Bitcoins) rather than an inflationary one (dollars)?

Based on previous businesses that've offered Bitcoin loans, a common reason to borrow money in Bitcoins is because the person has no intention of paying off the loan. It doesn't take a large proportion of loans going bad before lenders start losing money on average at any reasonable interest rate, and increasing the interest rate will just increase the proportion of bad loans to good loans.

What legal or contractual constructs did previous bitcoin lenders attempt to use to ensure repayment? Surely they required some form of collateral or obtained sufficient information to be able to place a lien on the borrower's (thieves by your description) property.
Post reply on HN