Mr Narendra Modi
Vote Now: Who Should Be Time's Person of the Year? Edward Snowden
141–147 of 147 posts
Re: Vote Now: Who Should Be Time's Person of the Year? Edward Snowden
#142NARENDRA MODI
Re: Vote Now: Who Should Be Time's Person of the Year? Edward Snowden
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
How do you know it does not immediately utilise those rights?
Please just say use
To me "utilise" has a slightly different meaning that "use". I am not a native speaker though. Is it just a fancy way of saying "use"? I thought it implied "using" an option/feature/opportunity to do something. So one "utilises" that to do something.
Re: Vote Now: Who Should Be Time's Person of the Year? Edward Snowden
#144Re: Vote Now: Who Should Be Time's Person of the Year? Edward Snowden
#145Poll 2010: http://content.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,288... And then it became: http://content.time.com/time/person-of-the-year/2010/ So probably this year it will be Miley Cyrus...
Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan got a lot of positive votes. I imagine he doesn't have same support after Gezi.
Time person of the year is not about the best person. It's about the most influential person.
Hitler won before.
Re: Vote Now: Who Should Be Time's Person of the Year? Edward Snowden
#146Miley Cyrus has more votes than Edward Snowden. How can that be?
Is that an honest question? You realise that almost no-one gives a fuck about Snowden, right? Most people really just don't care. The Guardian newspaper has (if we're generous) a circulation of 250,000 people. The (untrustworthy) numbers of the MileyCyrusVEVO "Wrecking Ball" video are 352,117,848 views.
> 352,117,848 views.
Now I'm depressed.