Earlier quoted context omitted.
Obviously there will be a contention when you have an asset that is shared and they flag it in a different way... and on a certain level it makes sense that "public" wins when you have 1 public and 1 private because if one person chooses to share anything else then it's public, so why should connections be different? But on another level, no. If a person has decided their connections are private information, then the…
Right, when preferences are in conflict do you protect the person who cares or the person who doesn't? Also privacy is like a thermodynamic arrow. You can't unspread a secret or make public information private. So you shouldn't treat the decision to go public lightly.
There is a cost to always protecting the person who cares, which is that people may self-modify to care more, making cooperation harder. (Or just pretend to care more than they actually do.)
It's not necessarily a worry in this particular case, but it's worth considering in the general case.