Does anyone know if gandi uses ECC in their servers? This is possibly my biggest problem with the VPS fad, nobody will give you a straight answer about whether or not you can actually rely on them to not silently corrupt data.
An IPv6-only VPS that costs less
71–80 of 82 posts
Re: An IPv6-only VPS that costs less
#72Unrelated to the ipv6 subject, but does anyone else just find the whole concept of "credits" that gandi is using absolutely irritating? I know that it lists "or about $xx.xx per month" next to the credit cost, but why in the hell even have the credits in the first place? It's easier to just use the actual costs in the customer's local currency than have them try and figure out what exactly a credit/"coin" is worth.
This concept answers to many issues Gandi faced. * Being "cloud-ish" and have a pay-as-you-go system * Computing a price to use a 256MB of RAM for 3 hours in real currency was too complicated (like, for example : 0.0000174€) * Having no surprise at the end of the month, as some hosting providers compute the global use and bill the consumption at the end of the month (you may have surprise) * Using credits, to create…
https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/
The latter two do keep track of fractional charges. They deduct $0.01 from prepaid credits once that much is owed. Since you accept multiple currencies, this becomes a bit more complex but still doable. For example, let the user choose the currency to display, or pick a single standard currency (euros?) and use it as your units.
Tarsnap and NFSn choose to refund your prepaid credits if and only if you close your account with them. Not every prepaid system lets you get your prepayments back at all. I am fine with this: I am willing to pay a bit more (prepayment without refund) in order to limit my liability to the amount I intend to pay.
Re: An IPv6-only VPS that costs less
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you intend to host your service behind something like CloudFlair it doesn't matter that some users don't have IPv6 yet: they'll contact the cache service via IPv4 and it'll contact your servers as needed via IPv6. The end user doesn't have to care, or even know at all, and you have just made a saving by not having to pay for IPv4 addresses. People will start to care when IPv6 takeup hits critical mass and we start…
I'm just waiting for when we get to the point where there are thousands of users behind the same ipv4 address and one of them gets the ip banned from something popular. I'm sure customers would start caring then.
Re: An IPv6-only VPS that costs less
#74One of the big reasons we didn't implement IPv6 on our domain servers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6_brokenness_and_DNS_whitel... Alternative: http://www.opendns.com/technology/ipv6/
Someone thought it would be cool to publish AAAA addresses before the networky folks had configured v6. In production. Laffs were had.
Re: An IPv6-only VPS that costs less
#75Does anyone know if gandi uses ECC in their servers? This is possibly my biggest problem with the VPS fad, nobody will give you a straight answer about whether or not you can actually rely on them to not silently corrupt data.
Re: An IPv6-only VPS that costs less
#76Does anyone know if gandi uses ECC in their servers? This is possibly my biggest problem with the VPS fad, nobody will give you a straight answer about whether or not you can actually rely on them to not silently corrupt data.
I know for sure that Gandi use ECC in their servers.
Re: An IPv6-only VPS that costs less
#77We designed Brightbox Cloud with the scarcity of public IPv4 addresses in mind since day one. Running out of addresses shouldn't be a surprise to anyone! http://brightbox.com/blog/2012/01/11/ipv6-servers/ We're not as cheap as gandi though, heh :)
Re: An IPv6-only VPS that costs less
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder who else but tech nerds should be interested in IPv6?
I'm quite sure Gandi targets who you call "tech nerds" - and they promote v6 also in that move. IPv6 has a future, I bet
Re: An IPv6-only VPS that costs less
#79Re: An IPv6-only VPS that costs less
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
I know of several German ISPs (Kabel Deutschland, MNet) that don't even give you a dynamic IPv4 IP anymore, but use Dual-Stack Lite (that is, IPv6, and carrier-grade NAT to access public IPv4 addresses). Oh, and they limit the ports (and thus connections) you can have open at a time, to something like 1000. I wouldn't want to have such a connection.
I'm on Kabel Deutschland and have a static IPv4. Is that a regional thing only?