Ask HN: Universe expands. What's the area outside the universe called?
1–9 of 9 posts
Re: Ask HN: Universe expands. What's the area outside the universe called?
#2Re: Ask HN: Universe expands. What's the area outside the universe called?
#3Just today, Fraser Cain posted a video to answer this question.
Have a look : http://youtu.be/Kj0TwTonG_8
Hope it helps!
Re: Ask HN: Universe expands. What's the area outside the universe called?
#4Everything that exists, exists within the universe, there is nothing 'outside', there is no 'outside'. At least under the classical understanding, or theory, of existence. Some multiverse models posit that there may be other universes that we may one day expand into. Others yet posit that these other 'bubbles' might have differing laws of physics to us, and could destroy us on contact. Fun.
Re: Ask HN: Universe expands. What's the area outside the universe called?
#5For instance, you can go on a straight line forever.
It "expands", but it does not "swell", because it does not mean anything for a boundless space to be "swelling".
The "expansion" phenomenon, known as "metric expansion of space" [1], is not "swelling" at all. Only the spatial scale of the Universe is expanding.
Furthermore, this process is isotropic, which means wherever you are observing from, it will always seem like you are at the center of the expansion process.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_expansion_of_space
EDIT: fixed typos (damn keyboard)
Re: Ask HN: Universe expands. What's the area outside the universe called?
#6Re: Ask HN: Universe expands. What's the area outside the universe called?
#7another way of saying the same thing is that the maths used in the physical models doesn't "embed" the universe in anything. there's no need for an external reference. you can do everything internally, consistently. it's quite neat, actually.
that doesn't mean that there "really is" nothing. just that nothing extra is needed for the theory, and since nothing extra can be observed, it's simpler to not have anything.
in other words - you can mathematically describe a universe that expands, but doesn't need anything to expand into. since that fits observations (within reason) and is simpler than a model that needs something extra "outside" that also needs explaining (and how would you explain that?!), it's preferred.
Re: Ask HN: Universe expands. What's the area outside the universe called?
#8Re: Ask HN: Universe expands. What's the area outside the universe called?
#9if you mean "what does the universe expand into?" then the answer, as far as we know, is that "it doesn't work like that". another way of saying the same thing is that the maths used in the physical models doesn't "embed" the universe in anything. there's no need for an external reference. you can do everything internally, consistently. it's quite neat, actually. that doesn't mean that there "really is" nothing. just…