31–40 of 165 posts
They didn't seem to use his comps… I'm assuming he had access to the same pool of photography that the finals used, but that doesn't mean they ripped him off. The work on top of the photos seems very different to me.
Did you get to the part where they clearly posted his comps on facebook?
Where are the internet hippies saying everything should be free?
My question as well. I'd love to hear from the advocates of "It's digital, there is no cost to the content producer for others to make copies."
They didn't seem to use his comps… I'm assuming he had access to the same pool of photography that the finals used, but that doesn't mean they ripped him off. The work on top of the photos seems very different to me.
Where are the internet hippies saying everything should be free?
Most movies don't make what they used to--that is before the Internet. I would sue in small claims court. I'm surprised The Cricket didn't sub the job out to Indian graphic designer--and get away with paying a few rupees.
Besides, what the movie makes doesn't matter. He'd be suing the ad agency that ripped off his design, not the producers of the movie.
They didn't seem to use his comps… I'm assuming he had access to the same pool of photography that the finals used, but that doesn't mean they ripped him off. The work on top of the photos seems very different to me.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
My question as well. I'd love to hear from the advocates of "It's digital, there is no cost to the content producer for others to make copies."
The difference is the implicit agreement between the author and the agency, without which the former wouldn't have spent two months making those works.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The difference is the implicit agreement between the author and the agency, without which the former wouldn't have spent two months making those works.
There is also an agreement between you and artists that if you want to watch a movie or listen to a music cd you also pay for it.
Seems weird he mentioned Spike Lee (who did nothing wrong, as far as I can tell) so many times, but didn't name the agency. Seems to hurt the wrong party's reputation. Additionally, he has no apparent way to contact him. EDIT: I really don't want to point fingers with 0 proof, but Spike Lee happens to be CEO of an ad agency named Spike DDB. https://twitter.com/SpikeDDB
Where are the internet hippies saying everything should be free?
My question as well. I'd love to hear from the advocates of "It's digital, there is no cost to the content producer for others to make copies."