Live data from Hacker News

33 Questions

github.com

31–40 of 169 posts

Re: 33 Questions

#31
If the goal is to have questions which can be answered only with yes or no. I don't think asking for location of the person is good thing, because there would be so many questions as there is locations.

"Do you live in China, India, The United States, Indonesia, Brazil or Pakistan?" is not good question.

Re: 33 Questions

#33
I don't think this problem is solvable in any elegant form, but it is solvable. You'll just end up with massively conjunctive questions that you can't even hold in your head at once, like "27: Are you a non-practicing Catholic with exactly three children, or an asian owner of a minivan produced between 1998 and 2004 that isn't green, or a licensed boat mechanic with astigmatism, or..." and so on for the next 6 pages.

In short, you can draw categories to include or exclude as precise a number as you like, you just have to be willing to draw really, really complicated boundaries.

Re: 33 Questions

#34
> To contribute to the project, open up a pull request and add your question to the list below. All questions are open to debate and discussion.

This is a completely wrong way to approach the problem. Because the questions should all divide the population into two parts the questions should be 'matched' to each other. This approach is a bit like doing a PCA by figuring out one component, then the other, then the rest...

One way to solve this problem is to have a lot of yes/no questions (like a big Karnaugh-table), then everybody would have a long bitstring as his unique ID. Now you need to compress that bitstring -- like the minimization of the Karnaugh-table.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karnaugh_map

-- you need to generalize this for N number of questions (which can be done), then you'd have 33 complex questions like 'is it true that (you live in NA AND you are male) OR (you live in Canada AND you are white AND ) .. and so on and on.

Re: 33 Questions

#35
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Northern Hemisphere has roughly 90% of the population[1]. That is far from 50% what we should be looking for. [1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Hemisphere

Are you born above or below the tropic of cancer then: replace with whatever latitude separates humans into equal groups.

This make other questions based on geography useless (as in the second question). Thats not to say the already given second question is better than your one

Re: 33 Questions

#37

Just use: - Birthday (19~ bits) - Rough Location (remaining bits) And base the questions around those two, for example, where you born on a 1-15th, does the city you were born in start with the letter's a-k. This part would be an exercise in statistics, I would think. edit: And one bit for if you were the first to be born of two identical twins =p

Triplets?

Just add time of birth. I don't see how you could split correctly with a bit for twins.

Re: 33 Questions

#38
33 is not the constraint. If we increase the limit to 50 and these 50 questions can fingerprint an individual then that will be really interesting.

Some hard problems :- 1. Distinguish twins 2. Using characters in names as some like Chinese use non-ascii names.

Re: 33 Questions

#40
I thought it would be more plausible and probably more interesting to do this in maybe 40 questions. To do this in 33, as several others have pointed out, would require 33 questions that each almost perfectly bisect the population and are almost perfectly independent of each other.

With 40 or 45, we could relax that a bit and use questions that are actually meaningful. Two people who are within a few bits of each other would actually be similar in ways we care about, unlike two people who are similar because their transliterated last names both appear in the last half of the alphabet.

Post reply on HN