Why I'm moving my clients to static blogging engines

Post by jkhowland » Sat, Nov 23, 2013, 8:57 PM UTC

andrewcooke wrote: post #7

scottcowley wrote: post #6

Sorry - what is "static blogging?"

ask the spam accounts. i'm sure they'll be happy to fill you in... [it's serving static - pre-rendered html - web pages. like blogging with github or bitbucket, for example.] [at time of posting half of comments were new accounts with content-less "wow" comments. [or people who don't know how to edit posts. haha.] if that's cynical i'm a pink giraffe.]

Post by dewey_smith » Sat, Nov 23, 2013, 8:58 PM UTC

dylz wrote: post #10

out of curiosity, do you take paypal?

Post by r0muald » Sat, Nov 23, 2013, 9:01 PM UTC

Post by krapp » Sat, Nov 23, 2013, 9:05 PM UTC

r0muald wrote: post #16

"Never worry about getting your site hacked. Since there isn’t a database, there’s nothing to hack." Please. Seriously statiq.io wants prospective clients to believe this is their view on "hacking sites"?

Post by aharris88 » Sat, Nov 23, 2013, 9:06 PM UTC

krapp wrote: post #18

r0muald wrote: post #16

"Never worry about getting your site hacked. Since there isn’t a database, there’s nothing to hack." Please. Seriously statiq.io wants prospective clients to believe this is their view on "hacking sites"?

I know... Is there a server? Are there user accounts? Is there something generating the static pages? Then there's something to hack.