Live data from Hacker News

Someone just made a $147,239,214 Bitcoin transfer

blockchain.info

61–70 of 474 posts

Re: Someone just made a $147,239,214 Bitcoin transfer

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or why it would be ideal to be used by the government - so we could track how they move money around, prevent corruption and generally keep an eye on the untrustworthy ones.

Let's say that you pay for Virgin Galactic ticket - that will be a fairly large transaction pointing to your wallet. Someone will be able connect the dots and find out that you also bought Viagra, and a penis enlargement pump. Do you really want that connected to you? Another case - you buy something from one of the stores that accept bitcoins. That store may have the address of your bitcoin wallet. They will be able…

You could create a new Bitcoin Wallet and transfer the bitcoins to your "new" wallet.

Re: Someone just made a $147,239,214 Bitcoin transfer

#62
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You clearly don't have a clue about how bitcoin works. If two parties want to make their transactions totally untraceable it is possible. As far as I can tell, this transfer could be made by the same wallet, from generated address to the other in order to initiate speculations and show that BTC can actually be used for big un-taxed, non-stoppable money transfer, or it was just a way to show to the IRS what money is m…

You just assume that most people will know what to do and how to do it to protect themselves.

I assume that someone with hundreds of millions of dollars does.

Re: Someone just made a $147,239,214 Bitcoin transfer

#63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

priority = sum(input_value_in_base_units * input_age) / size_in_bytes A recently received single bitcoin can have a transaction fee, while one that has aged may not.

Damn, how do you do quotes?

4 spaces in front of the content - the problem with it is that on larger text, it puts it in a scrolling div, which is not easy to read.

Re: Someone just made a $147,239,214 Bitcoin transfer

#64
Consider this: They paid $0.00 for the transfer of $150 million dollars.

A direct (i.e. not based on third party credit, regulations, etc.) transfer of wealth of this magnitude between two entities usually consists of a heavily guarded, insured, physical shipment of cash or gold. Depending how safely you want to make the transfer, and how far the entities are on the globe, it can cost hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars.

Bitcoin has real value. It solves problems on an incredible scale. I wish I realized this months ago.

Re: Someone just made a $147,239,214 Bitcoin transfer

#65

Well, this is just another reason why bitcoin will not work - you can track money changing hands.. Certain three letter agencies would have not trouble tracking most of the transfers, all over the world.

Credit cards work...

Re: Someone just made a $147,239,214 Bitcoin transfer

#66
> Someone

This is a little misleading. This could be a business etc.

A mining pool or exchange transferring from one wallet to another (ie. to cold storage)?

You wouldn't want a typo in your address for that amount of cash! I'd probably break it up into a bunch of smaller transactions just to be safe.

Re: Someone just made a $147,239,214 Bitcoin transfer

#67
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The government would have to consider Bitcoins as a currency for it to be taxed like a currency. Right now it has no status identified for legal purposes so no way to tax it. I am sure that several governments are looking in to it as we speak. Death and taxes

The government can tax anything it wants. For example, barter exchanges are taxable by the government, even if no actual money changed hands. They would just put a dollar figure on the barter, and then tax it accordingly. Bitcoin doesn't have to be a currency in order for the government to tax any gains made on its sale or transfer.

Government can tax anything they want. Even the babysitter and making change from a stranger.

Re: Someone just made a $147,239,214 Bitcoin transfer

#69
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The government would have to consider Bitcoins as a currency for it to be taxed like a currency. Right now it has no status identified for legal purposes so no way to tax it. I am sure that several governments are looking in to it as we speak. Death and taxes

The government can tax anything it wants. For example, barter exchanges are taxable by the government, even if no actual money changed hands. They would just put a dollar figure on the barter, and then tax it accordingly. Bitcoin doesn't have to be a currency in order for the government to tax any gains made on its sale or transfer.

The IRS purposely keeps the definition of income loosely defined so that they can broadly apply it as new schemes and technologies arise. I am sure the IRS could bust you for income tax evasion if you didn't declare your bitcoin appreciation as income.

Re: Someone just made a $147,239,214 Bitcoin transfer

#70
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You clearly don't have a clue about how bitcoin works. If two parties want to make their transactions totally untraceable it is possible. As far as I can tell, this transfer could be made by the same wallet, from generated address to the other in order to initiate speculations and show that BTC can actually be used for big un-taxed, non-stoppable money transfer, or it was just a way to show to the IRS what money is m…

You just assume that most people will know what to do and how to do it to protect themselves.

You assume that software doesn't automate the process.
Post reply on HN