Live data from Hacker News

YouTube Shoots Google in Foot, Publishers Suffer Collateral Damage

blog.pagefair.com

1–10 of 62 posts

Re: YouTube Shoots Google in Foot, Publishers Suffer Collateral Damage

#2
Youtube wasn't the breaking point for me, twitch.tv was. Granted, the streamers themselves do have control over this, I found it utterly annoying to see the same 1 or 2 ads played over and over in my face. Once I had ABP installed, the whole internet suddenly became faster to load too. The only annoying thing is, some websites that have those annoying ads that scroll across the webpage will now result in a dead-iframe blocking its content. Fortunately, I know how to right click, inspect element, navigate to the iframe container, and delete it, which, takes about 5 seconds.

Re: YouTube Shoots Google in Foot, Publishers Suffer Collateral Damage

#5
Websites are expensive and other than charging users money, ads are an easy way to generate revenue. I like using free services and I'd like to support the owner. As such, I don't use AdBlock.

However, YouTube forced me to. Back when YouTube used a small ad in the top-right, it was fine. Banner overlays were a bit more annoying, but still tolerable. Pre-rolls? No way, they stop me from getting to the content I want.

I wish I could switch to Vimeo but there's not a lot of content there.

Re: YouTube Shoots Google in Foot, Publishers Suffer Collateral Damage

#6
I don't know about y'all, but on Chrome right now, no ad-blocker works on Youtube anymore. The adblocking works on every other site, even other video sites. But Youtube pre-rolls continue to play no matter what extension or filters I use (and making sure that "acceptable ads" are off).

Anyone else experiencing this?

Re: YouTube Shoots Google in Foot, Publishers Suffer Collateral Damage

#8
post #5

Websites are expensive and other than charging users money, ads are an easy way to generate revenue. I like using free services and I'd like to support the owner. As such, I don't use AdBlock. However, YouTube forced me to. Back when YouTube used a small ad in the top-right, it was fine. Banner overlays were a bit more annoying, but still tolerable. Pre-rolls? No way, they stop me from getting to the content I want.…

Aren't most pre-rolls 3 seconds before you can watch the video?

And it's funny to me to watch people smugly use AdBlock. All you folks who use it understand that Google could detect that you AdBlocked, and then refuse to show the video, right? I mean, you get that, right?

Re: YouTube Shoots Google in Foot, Publishers Suffer Collateral Damage

#9
post #5

Websites are expensive and other than charging users money, ads are an easy way to generate revenue. I like using free services and I'd like to support the owner. As such, I don't use AdBlock. However, YouTube forced me to. Back when YouTube used a small ad in the top-right, it was fine. Banner overlays were a bit more annoying, but still tolerable. Pre-rolls? No way, they stop me from getting to the content I want.…

Aren't most pre-rolls 3 seconds before you can watch the video? And it's funny to me to watch people smugly use AdBlock. All you folks who use it understand that Google could detect that you AdBlocked, and then refuse to show the video, right? I mean, you get that, right?

Almost all were but increasingly a lot make me wait 30 seconds or more.

Re: YouTube Shoots Google in Foot, Publishers Suffer Collateral Damage

#10
post #6

I don't know about y'all, but on Chrome right now, no ad-blocker works on Youtube anymore. The adblocking works on every other site, even other video sites. But Youtube pre-rolls continue to play no matter what extension or filters I use (and making sure that "acceptable ads" are off). Anyone else experiencing this?

Works for me. You could try a different adblocker, but it should work. Did you try turning it off and on again? ;)

I don't even find the option anymore to not block the pre-rolls, which was an experimental option for some time. Seems to be on by default now (or even integrated into the filter lists?)

Post reply on HN